Jump to content
We need you! See something you could improve? Make an edit and help improve WikSM for everyone.

Accessory Navicular Syndrome

From WikiSM

Other Names

  • Os Naviculare Syndrome
  • Accessory Navicular Syndrome
  • Os Tibiale Externum Syndrome
  • Prehallux Syndrome
  • Navicular Bone Accessory Pain
  • Painful Accessory Navicular

Background

History

  • Needs to be updated

Epidemiology

  • Incidence
    • Incidence of accessory navicular is approximately 4%[1]
    • Another study estimates incidence between 2% and 14%[2]

Pathophysiology

Normal navicular (left) and accessory navicular (right)[3]
Illustrative diagram presenting the most common location of accessory navicular[4]
(A) Image of right foot showing localized erythema and swelling over the medial aspect of the right mid-foot (arrow) and (B) X-ray of right foot showing accessory navicular bone (circle)[5]

General

  • Accessory Navicular: congenital anomaly in which the tuberosity of the navicular develops from a secondary ossification center

Etiology

  • Symptoms can occur due to
    • Tension, shearing, or compression forces transmitted through the posterior tibial tendon to the fibrocartilaginous interface
    • Shoe pressure on the accessory bone
    • Most often occurs after trauma
      • One study found 74% of athletes, 39% of non-athletes had a traumatic event[6]
      • For example twisting injury, abnormal midfoot biomechanics, and posterior tibial tendon pathology.

Associated Conditions

  • Pes Planus
    • This is contentious and not agreed upon in the literature
    • Incidence ranges from 15% to 34%[6]
  • Achilles Tendon Contracture
  • Gastrocnemius Contracture

Anatomic of Os Naviculare

  • Accessory navicular is one of the most common accessory ossicles
  • Can be divided into three types[7]
  • Type I
    • Small ossicle that is embedded within the distal fibers of the posterior tibialis tendon
    • Near its insertion point on the navicular tuberosity
  • Type II
    • Most common
    • Larger fragment with a distinct interface or synchondrosis
    • Composed of cartilaginous or fibrous tissue adjacent to the main navicular
  • Type III
    • Cornuate-shaped or partially fused to the main navicular
    • Representing enlargement of the medial aspect of the tuberosity.

Risk Factors

  • Unknown

Differential Diagnosis

Differential Diagnosis Foot Pain


Clinical Features

Clinical demonstration of normal Single Limb Heel Rise.[8]

History

  • Tends to occur in younger athletes
  • Pain is typically along the medial arch
  • Impingement in the area of the sinus tarsi especially if pes planus is present
  • Direct pressure from shoes or cleats may worsen
  • Direct trauma or a sprain mechanism is common, occurring in 35% of patients[9]
  • Symptoms are worse with walking, running and training[6]

Physical Exam: Physical Exam Foot

  • Inspect for hindfoot valgus, pes planus, midfoot abduction
  • Inspect shoes for exaggerated wear of the medial portion of the sole
  • Tenderness along the accessory navicular is often present

Special Tests


Evaluation

Normal navicular (left) and accessory navicular (right)[10]
Long axis view of the posterior tibial tendon with the accessory navicular labeled[11]

Radiographs

  • Standard Radiographs Foot
    • Weight bearing radiographs are initial imaging modality of choice
  • External oblique view
    • Can better characterize the size and appearance of the accessory navicular.
    • Proximal retraction of the accessory navicular can indicate possible avulsion injury through the synchondrosis.
  • Findings
    • Main body of the navicular itself is typically much wider with increased medial protrusion compared with controls[12]
    • May also see pes planus, decreased calcaneal pitch, talonavicular uncoverage, and sag of the talo–first metatarsal angle

MRI

  • Most valuable imaging modality
  • Findings[13]
    • Edema in the accessory ossicle itself as well as the medial edge of the navicular.
    • Fluid or edema within the synchondrosis itself, indicating a stress reaction or possible sprain injury
    • Can also evaluate distal aspect of the posterior tibialis tendon for any tendon damage or injury.

Ultrasound

  • Potential findings
    • May indicate instability or hypermobility of the accessory bone.
    • Thickening or tendinosis of the posterior tibialis tendon

CT

  • Useful to determine if a seeming accessory navicular is an acute avulsion fragment.

Bone Scintography

  • Not commonly used
  • May show increased uptake at the medial edge of the navicular, consistent with stress reaction

Classification

  • Not applicable

Management

Short Walking Boot

Nonoperative

  • Indications
    • Most patients, especially athletes[14]
  • Activity restriction
    • Restriction from running and training
    • Avoidance of activities that exacerbate symptoms are initiated.
  • Other therapy
  • Orthotics
    • Insoles with medial arch posting may relieve stress on the synchondrosis and distal posterior tibialis tendon
    • Often necessary to incorporate a relief underneath the accessory navicular to relieve direct pressure on it
  • Heel Wedge
    • Medial heel wedge can be beneficial, especially if hindfoot valgus is present
  • Immobilization
  • Physical Therapy
    • Emphasis on motion and strengthening
    • Cardio training and conditioning

Operative

  • Indications
    • Failure of conservative management
    • For athletes, consideration of in-season vs off-season depending on severity of symptoms
  • Technique
    • Kidner procedure (excise accessory bone, advance posterior tibialis tendon)
    • Percutaneous drilling of the accessory navicular and synchondrosis
    • Open fusion of the accessory bone to the main body
    • Gastrocnemius recession or Achilles tendon lengthening can be considered

Rehab and Return to Play

Rehabilitation

  • Postoperative
    • Immobilized in Short Leg Cast or Short Leg Boot for up to 6 weeks
    • Weight bearing advanced along with range of motion, open chain strengthening
    • Around 8-10 weeks, initiate heavier resistance training and closed chain exercises
    • Also return to normal footwear around 8-10 weeks, plus/minus orthotic
    • Return to unrestricted sporting activity around 5-6 months

Return to Play/ Work

  • Staged return to play[15]
    • Stage 1: Pain-free weightbearing and daily activities.
    • Stage 2: Restoration of strength, balance, and proprioception.
    • Stage 3: Gradual reintroduction of sport-specific skills and training.
    • Stage 4: Full return to competition, contingent on anatomical and functional healing, psychological readiness, and compliance with orthoses or equipment modifications

Complications and Prognosis

Prognosis

  • Nonoperative treatment outcomes
    • Appears to have a relatively low success rate
    • Kopp et al: nonoperative treatment was successful in only 7% of athletes, 34% of nonathletes[6]
    • Grogen et al: resolution in only 2/10 patients treated with a cast, 0/6 in patients treated with custom orthotics[16]
  • Surgical outcomes
    • Veitch et al: 17/21 patients reported good outcome following the Kidner procedure[7]
    • Ray and Goldberg found 90% excellent or good results at 2 years or longer follow-up.[17]

Complications

  • Inability to return to sport
  • Persistent medial foot pain
  • Functional impairment
  • Structural deformities such as pes planus

See Also

Internal

External


References

  1. Lawson JP, Ogden JA, Sella E, et al. The painful accessory navicular. Skeletal Radiol 1984;12(4):250–62.
  2. Bizarro AH. On sesamoid and supernumerary bones of the limbs. J Anat. 1921;55(pt 4):256-268.
  3. Image courtesy of rehabymypatient.com
  4. Stolarz, Kacper, et al. "The prevalence and anatomy of accessory navicular bone: a meta-analysis." Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 46.10 (2024): 1731-1743.
  5. Pothiawala, Sohil. "Os Navicular Syndrome: A Symptomatic Accessory Ossicle of the Foot." Case Reports in Clinical Practice (2022).
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Jegal H, Park YU, Kim JS, et al. Accessory navicular syndrome in athlete vs general population. Foot Ankle Int 2016;37(8):862–7.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Veitch JM. Evaluation of the Kidner procedure in treatment of symptomatic accessory tarsal scaphoid. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;131:210–3.
  8. Vallance, Patrick, et al. "Self-reported pain with single leg heel raise or single leg hop offer distinct information as measures of severity in men with midportion and insertional Achilles tendinopathy: An observational cross-sectional study." Physical Therapy in Sport 47 (2021): 23-31.
  9. Chung JW, Chu IT. Outcome of fusion of a painful accessory navicular to the primary navicular. Foot Ankle Int 2009;30(2):106–9.
  10. Image courtesy of https://footeducation.com/
  11. Image courtesy of ankleandfootcentre.com.au
  12. Seehausen DA, Harris LR, Kay RM, et al. Accessory navicular is associated with wider and more prominent navicular bone in pediatric patients by radiographic measurement. J Pediatr Orthop 2016;36(5):521–5.
  13. Miller TT, Staron RB, Feldman F, et al. The symptomatic accessory tarsal navicular bone: assessment with MR imaging. Radiology 1995;195(3):849–53.
  14. Kopp FJ, Marcus RE. Clinical outcome of surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular. Foot Ankle Int 2004;25(1):27–30.
  15. Smith, Teresa Riemer. "Management of dancers with symptomatic accessory navicular: 2 case reports." journal of orthopaedic & sports physical therapy 42.5 (2012): 465-473.
  16. Grogan DP, Gasser SI, Ogden JA. The painful accessory navicular: a clinical and histopathological study. Foot Ankle. 1989;10(3):164-169.
  17. Ray S, Goldberg VM. Surgical treatment of the accessory navicular. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;177:61-66.
Created by:
John Kiel on 30 January 2022 07:30:46
Authors:
Last edited:
26 October 2025 12:01:04
Categories: