Clavicle Fracture
Other Names
- Collar Bone Fracture
- Midshaft Clavicle Fracture
- Clavicle Shaft Fracture
- Medial Clavicle Fracture
Background
- This page references all fractures patterns of the Clavicle
- Can be broken up into distal third, mid third and proximal third
History
- Etymology: clavicula meaning "tendril, small key, rod, bolt"
Epidemiology
- Represent 2-5% of all fractures in adults[1]
- 10-15% of fractures in children[2]
- Some data suggests it is the most common fracture of childhood (need citation)
- Incidence of 29-64 per 100,000 person years[3]
- Bimodal distribution
- Young males (under 30) and elderly patients (over 70)[4]
- Midshaft, diaphyseal or middle third
- 2/3 of clavicle fractures in adults[1]
- 90% of clavicle fractures in children
- Lateral shaft/ third
- 25% of all clavicle fractures
- Medial shaft/ third
- 2-3% of clavicle fractures
Financial Burden
- Systematic review (2020)[5]
- Overall cost for operative treatment is $10,000 USD
- Overall cost for nonoperative treatment is $8,000 USD
- Mean absence from work: 8 to 193 days (operative), 24-69 days (nonoperative)
Introduction


General
- Most common fracture of the shoulder girdle
- 80% of cases involve the mid shaft of the clavicle
- The vast majority of cases can be succesfully managed nonoperatively
Mechanism
- Most cases involve fall directly onto lateral shoulder.
- Fall on outstretched hand
- Direct trauma
- In younger patients, traffic accidents and sports account for most fractures
- Traffic accident-induced clavicle fractures[7]
- 39% occur in cyclists
- 26% in car drivers/ passengers
- 17% in pedestrians
- 17% in motorcyclists
Associated Conditions
- Scapular Fracture
- Scapulothoracic Dissociation
- Rib Fracture
- Pneumothorax
- Neurovascular Injury
- Floating shoulder
- Acromioclavicular Joint Separation
- Sternoclavicular Joint Injury
Anatomy of the Clavicle
- Laterally the clavicle articulates with the acromion to form the Acromioclavicular Joint (AC joint)
- Stabilized by the Acromioclavicular Ligament, Coracoclavicular Ligaments, Joint Capsule
- Dynamic Stabilizers: Deltoid, Trapezius
- Medially, the clavicle articulates with the sternum to form the Sternoclavicular Joint
Risk Factors
- Osteoporosis
- Osteopenia
- Male > female
Differential Diagnosis
Differential Diagnosis Shoulder Pain
- Fractures
- Proximal Humerus Fracture
- Humeral Shaft Fracture
- Clavicle Fracture
- Scapula Fracture
- First Rib Fracture (traumatic or atraumatic)
- Floating Shoulder
- Dislocations & Separations
- Arthropathies
- Muscle & Tendon Injuries
- Rotator Cuff
- Bursopathies
- Ligament Injuries
- Neuropathies
- Other
- Pediatrics
- Coracoid Avulsion Fracture
- Humeral Head Epiphysiolysis (Little League Shoulder)
Clinical Features

History
- Will report some type of trauma
- Most commonly fall onto lateral shoulder
- Patient may report a history of a cracking sound during the injury
- Complain of anterior shoulder pain, swelling, bruising, deformity
- Pain localized over the fracture site
- Arm is often held in adduction, internal rotation
- Worse with movement of arm
Physical: Physical Exam Shoulder
- Evaluate for deformity, tenting, open fracture
- Visible deformity is often present
- Middle 1/3 typically pulled downward by pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi
- Tenderness at the site of the fracture
- Evaluate for skin tenting, which implies impending open fracture
- Perform careful neurovascular exam
Evaluation



Radiographs
- Standard Radiographs Shoulder
- May act as a screening tool, consider bilateral
- Standard Radiographs Clavicle
- Need dedicated clavicle views
- Zanca view (15°) cephalic tilt
- Helpful to determine cranial/caudal displacement
- Weighted stress views no longer utilized
CT
- Helpful to evaluate degree of injury i.e. displacement, shortening, comminution
- Evaluate for articular extension
- Neurovascular injuries
- Better evaluates the sternoclavicular/ proximal lesions
Ultrasound
- A meta-analysis showed ultrasound to be highly sensitive and specific for clavicle fractures[10]
- It's exact role when compared to CT and XR is not entirely clear
Classification
Allman Classification
- Type I: Middle 1/3[11]
- Type II: Lateral 1/3
- Type III: Medial 1/3
Neer Classification
- Describes lateral 1/3 clavicle fractures[2]
- Type 1: distal to the CC ligaments, minimally displaced fracture that is typically stable
- Type II: medial fragment that is discontinuous with the CC ligaments
- Craig modification: Importance of coronoid ligament[12]
- Separately classifies intra-articular and pediatric clavicle fractures
- Type III: intra-articular fracture of the acromioclavicular joint with intact CC ligaments
Edinburgh (or Robinson) Classification
- Uses Allman classification: medial (type I), middle (type II), and lateral (type III) thirds[7]
- Fracture is then subdivided based on magnitude of displacement
- Type A: Less than 100% displacement
- Type B: Greater than 100% displacement
- Type III can be further subdivided based on articular surface involvement
- Subgroup 1: No articular involvement
- Subgroup 2: Interarticular extension
- Type II can be categorized by the degree of fracture comminution
- Subgroup 1: Simple or wedge-type fracture patterns
- Subgroup 2: Segmental fracture patterns
Summary
- Modified Neer (Craig) Classification[13]
- Most prognostic when predicting delayed union or nonunion of lateral-third fractures
- Edinburgh (or Robinson) Classification
- Greatest prognostic value for middle third fractures
Management

Medial Third
Nonoperative
- Almost always nonoperative
- Typically non- or minimally displaced and rarely involve the sternoclavicular joint
- Immobilization: Shoulder Sling, less commonly and historically used was a Figure 8 Brace
- Duration 2 to 6 weeks
- Encourage early range of motion
- Avoid contact sports for at least 4 to 5 months
Operative
- Indications
- Injury or risk to mediastinal structures
- "Floating shoulder" polytrauma
- Significantly displaced
- Technique
- Closed reduction in the emergency department if possible
- Open reduction and internal fixation definitively
Pediatric Considerations
- Most often involve the medial epiphysis of the clavicle
- Doesn't ossify until age 20-25
- Easily confused with sternoclavicular joint dislocation
Middle Third
Nonoperative
- Typically first line therapy
- Indications
- Nondisplaced (Edinburgh type 2A)
- < 2 cm shortening, <1 cm displacement, no neurovascular injuries
- Place in Shoulder Sling or Figure 8 Brace
Operative
- Hard indications:
- Skin tenting
- Open
- Neurovascular compromise
- Multiple trauma
- Floating shoulder
- Displaced midshaft (Edinburgh type 2B)
- More controversial, nonop being called into question
- Canadian ortho trauma society has several large studies showing higher nonunion rates with nonoperative approach[18][19]
- Shortening > 2 cm predictive of nonunion/malunion[20]
- Nonunion rate as high as 20% in displaced, comminuted fractures treated nonsurgically[7]
- Surgical management should be considered in younger patients with clavicle shortening or deformity
Pediatric Considerations
- Less controversial than adults due to rapid bone healing and remodeling capabilities
- Virtually all are treated nonoperatively
- Surgical indications
- Open
- Neurovascular compromise
- Consider degree of shortening, displacement
- Treat with Shoulder Sling or Figure 8 Brace
- No difference between sling or figure 8 brace for alignment or union rates but sling better tolerated[21]
- Immobilize for 6-8 weeks
- Need radiographic evidence of healing prior to return to play
Lateral Third
Nonoperative
- Treatment modality of choice
- 98% of patients have good outcomes with minimally displaced or nondisplaced fractures[22]
- Most are nondisplaced or minimally displaced and extra-articular[7]
- Stable fractures (Neer Type I, III, IV)
- Treat with Shoulder Sling or Figure 8 Brace
Operative
- Hard indications:
- Skin tenting
- Open
- Neurovascular compromise
- Multiple trauma
- Floating shoulder
- Soft indication
- Coracoclavicular ligament stabilizes distal clavicle
- Injury see in Edinburgh type 3B with nonunion rates as high as 28%[2]
Pediatric Considerations
- Lateral clavicle physis fuses at approximately age 25
- Injuries more common to the physis, i.e. separation, than cortical break
- Most can be treated nonoperatively
Rehab and Return to Play
Rehabilitation
- Needs to be updated
Return to Play/Work
- Depends largely on age, location, severity, degree of healing and the occupation/sport
- Most patients can return to pre-injury levels around 6-8 weeks
- Avoid contact sports, strenuous activities until clinically healed
- General return to sport guidelines
- Full range of motion
- Normal strength of the shoulder
- No pain with forceful palpation of the fracture site
- Noncontact sports may return sooner than contact/ collision sports
- Return to play after surgical management[23]
- Some experts recommend hardware removal before return to play
- This typically occurs 1 year after placement
Prognosis and Complications
Prognosis
- In most cases in healthy patients, prognosis is excellent
Complications
- Nonunion: high risk
- Middle 1/3: Rate is 6% for all fractures, 15% for displaced fractures treated nonoperatively (need citation)
- Predictors of non-union: increasing displacement, comminution, advanced age, female gender, smoking status[24]
- Shoulder dysfunction
- Residual pain
- Malunion
- Shortening greater than 2 cm associated with neurological and functional problems[25]
- Nonunion rates for distal third clavicle fractures range from 28% to 44% (need citation)
- Many patients with clavicle fracture nonunion are asymptomatic and do not require any further treatment
- Poor cosmesis
- Surgical complications
- Hardware prominence
- Mechanical failure
- Pneumothorax
- Adhesive Capsulitis (4%, need citation)
- Brachial Plexus Injury
- Great vessel injury
- Post-traumatic arthritis
See Also
Internal
- Physical Exam Shoulder
- Shoulder Anatomy (Main)
- Neck Pain (Main)
- Shoulder Pain (Main)
- Elbow Pain (Main)
External
- Sports Medicine Review Shoulder Pain: https://www.sportsmedreview.com/by-joint/shoulder/
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Nordqvist A, Petersson C (1994) The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:127–132
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Neer CS II. Fractures of the distal third of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;58:43-50.
- ↑ Postacchini F, Gumina S, De Santis P, Albo F (2002) Epidemiology of clavicle fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11(5):452–456
- ↑ Stanley D, Trowbridge EA, Norris SH. The mechanism of clavicular fracture. A clinical and biomechanical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:461-4
- ↑ Kask G, Raittio L, Mattila VM, Launonen AP. Cost-Effectiveness of Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatment for Clavicle Fracture: a Systematic Literature Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Aug;13(4):391-399. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09640-0. PMID: 32383036; PMCID: PMC7340703.
- ↑ Image courtesy of getbodysmart.com
- ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 . Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:476-84.
- ↑ Riccio AI, Parikh SN. Examination of the injured child. In: Pediatric Musculoskeletal Physical Diagnosis: A Video-Enhanced Guide, 1st ed, Noonan K, Kocher M (Eds), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020. Copyright © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
- ↑ Nicholson, J. A., et al. "What is the role of ultrasound in fracture management?: diagnosis and therapeutic potential for fractures, delayed unions, and fracture-related infection." Bone & Joint Research 8.7 (2019): 304-312.
- ↑ Hassankhani A, Amoukhteh M, Jannatdoust P, Valizadeh P, Gholamrezanezhad A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic utility of ultrasound for clavicle fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 2024 Feb;53(2):307-318. doi: 10.1007/s00256-023-04396-3. Epub 2023 Jul 12. PMID: 37433884.
- ↑ Allman FL Jr. Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1967;49:774-84.
- ↑ Craig EV. Fractures of the clavicle. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, editors. Fractures in adults. 6th ed., Vol 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 1216-7.
- ↑ O’Neill BJ, Hirpara KM, O’Briain D, McGarr C, Kaar TK. Clavicle fractures: a comparison of five classification systems and their relationship to treatment outcomes. Int Orthop 2011;35:909-14. doi:10. 1007/s00264-010-1151-0
- ↑ Ropars, M., H. Thomazeau, and D. Huten. "Clavicle fractures." Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 103.1 (2017): S53-S59.
- ↑ Rowe CR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1968;58:29-42.
- ↑ Eskola A, Vainionpaa S, Myllynen P, Patiala H, Rokkanen P. Outcome of clavicular fracture in 89 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986; 105:337-8.
- ↑ Zlowodzki M, Zelle BA, Cole PA, Jeray K, McKee MD. Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: systematic review of 2144 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:504-7.
- ↑ McKee MD, Pedersen EM, Jones C, Stephen DJ, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, et al. Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88:35-40. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02795
- ↑ . McKee MD, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH. Midshaft malunions of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:790-7.
- ↑ Hill JM, McGuire MH, Crosby LA. Closed treatment of displaced middle-third fractures of the clavicle gives poor results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:537-41.
- ↑ Andersen K, Jensen PO, Lauritzen J. Treatment of clavicular fractures. Figure-of-eight bandage versus a simple sling. Acta Orthop Scand 1987;58:71-4.
- ↑ Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM, Wakefield AE. Estimating the risk of nonunion following non-operative treatment of a clavicle fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1359-65.
- ↑ Schlegel, TF, Hawkins, RJ. Fractures of the shoulder girdle. In: Shoulder Injuries in the Athlete: Surgical Repair and Rehabilitation, Hawkins, RJ, Misamore, GW (Eds), Churchill Livingstone, New York 1996. p.219.
- ↑ Evidence-Based orthopedics. (2012). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119413936
- ↑ McKee MD, Wild LM, Schemitsch EH. Midshaft malunions of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85(5):790-7.