Jump to content
We need you! See something you could improve? Make an edit and help improve WikSM for everyone.

Femoral Shaft Fracture

From WikiSM

Other Names

  • Femur Fracture
  • Femoral Diaphysis fracture
  • Atypical Femoral Shaft Fracture
  • Atypical Femoral Fracture (AFF)
  • Femoral Diaphyseal Fracture
  • Diaphyseal Femur Fracture
  • Midshaft Femur Fracture
  • Femoral Midshaft Fracture
  • Femoral Bone Shaft Fracture

Background

History

  • Hippocrates (c. 460–370 BCE), who described long-bone fractures (including the femur) and their management using traction and splinting techniques[1]
  • More detailed anatomic and clinical descriptions of femoral fractures emerged in the early 1800s, particularly among European surgeons[2]
  • The first documented operative attempt was in the 1850s by Bernhard von Langenbeck[3]

Epidemiology

  • Bimodal distribution in young healthy males (15-35) and elderly females (Over 60)
  • Worldwide incidence between 10 and 21 per 100,000 per years[4]
  • Approximately 2% of femoral shaft fractures are open[5]

Introduction

PA and lateral view of a mid shaft femoral shaft fracture[6]
Illustration of two types of femoral shaft fracture
Some types of femoral shaft fractures
Pre and post op illustration[7]

General

  • Femoral shaft fractures are significant injuries affecting the diaphyseal region of the femur
  • Most commonly seen in violent trauma in young males and minor trauma in geriatic patients
  • Diagnosis is suspected clinically and confirmed radiographically
  • Intramedullary nailing represents the gold standard treatment for most adult femoral shaft fractures

Terminology

  • Classically defined as the region from 5 cm below the lesser trochanter to the metaphyseal flare proximal to the femoral condyles

Etiology

  • High energy trauma most common in younger patients
    • Typically motor vehicle crash (87%), fall from elevation[8]
  • Low energy trauma in elderly patients
    • Most commonly fall from standing, pathologic

Anatomy of the Femur

Associated Injuries


Risk Factors

Bone Quality & Metabolic Factors

Pathologic Bone Conditions

  • Primary bone tumors (e.g., osteosarcoma)
  • Metastatic disease (e.g., breast, prostate, lung cancer)
  • Paget disease of bone[19]
  • Bone cysts or benign lesions

Medications

  • Long-term corticosteroid use
  • Bisphosphonate-associated atypical femur fractures[20]
  • Anticonvulsants (via effects on bone metabolism)

Repetitive Stress / Overuse

Demographic & Lifestyle Factors


Differential Diagnosis

Differential Diagnosis Thigh Pain

Differential Diagnosis Hip Pain


Clinical Features

A midshaft femur fracture is in a field traction splint with obvious swelling[21]

History

  • Characterize the mechanism of injury and trauma, including any other potential injuries[22]
  • Patient endorses severe thigh pain, inability to weight bear
  • Patients often endorse swelling, bruising
  • Often there is a visible deformity or limb shortening

Physical Exam: Thigh Exam Main

  • Tense, swollen, edematous thigh due to bleeding into fracture space
  • Deformity and abnormal limb positioning may or may not be present
  • Leg may be internally/ externally rotated, shortened
  • Tenderness at fracture site
  • A thorough neurovascular exam must be performed
    • Vascualr injuries occur in less than 1% of all long bone fracutres[23]

Special Tests

  • There are no dedicated special physical examination maneuvers specific for diagnosing femoral shaft fractures

Evaluation

Displaced, transverse, mid diaphyseal femur fracture
Distal femur with traction pin

Radiographs

CT

  • Typically not indicated
  • Can be used for fracture characterization, detection of radiographically occult fractures, or operative planning[24]
  • Can be useful for ipsilateral femoral neck fractures

MRI

  • Not indicated for femoral shaft fracture
  • May be considered for ipsilateral femoral neck fractures[25]

Ultrasound

  • Not routinely used in femoral shaft fracture evaluation
  • Can detect long bone fractures with sensitivity 64-100%, specificity 79-100%[26]
  • May be able to evaluate for hemorrhage or hematoma in the setting of undifferentiated hypotension

Classification

Winquist and Hansen Classification

  • Type 0: No comminution
  • Type I: Insignificant amount of comminution
  • Type II: Greater than 50% cortical contact
  • Type III: Less than 50% cortical contact
  • Type IV: Segmental fracture with no contact between proximal and distal fragment

OTA Classification

  • 32A: Simple
    • A1: Spiral
    • A2: Oblique, angle > 30 degrees
    • A3: Transverse, angle < 30 degrees
  • 32B: Wedge
    • B1: Spiral wedge
    • B2: Bending wedge
    • B3: Fragmented wedge
  • 32C: Complex
    • C1: Spiral
    • C2: Segmental
    • C3: Irregular

Management

A A 28-year-old man sustained a right femoral shaft fracture with a fracture fragment; B the lateral view after closed reduction showing that the fracture fragment is turned over and greatly displaced (grade IV displacement); C the lateral view at 3 months postoperatively showing that the fracture site defect and that the medial callus has grown well; D the lateral view at 3 months postoperatively showing that the fracture fragment is free in front of the shaft and that the callus has grown well behind the fracture; E the anteroposterior view at 1 year postoperatively showing good medial callus growth and the lateral bone defect at the fracture site; F the lateral view at 1 year postoperatively showing partial absorption of the free fracture fragment[27]
30-Year-old male suffered fall from > 15 feet height. a, b Pre-op radiograph demonstrates mid-shaft femur fracture. CRIF with AFN was done. c–e Immediate post-op radiographs depicting anatomic reduction and satisfactory implant placement. f, g 3-Month post-op X-ray depicts bony union[28]

Acute

  • Patients with femur fractures should be assessed following Advanced Trauma Life (ATLS) Support
    • Critical to identify other co-occurring and potentially life threatening injuries
  • It is possible to hemorrhage 1-3L of blood into the thigh following a femur fracture
    • Careful monitoring of hemodynamic static and hemoglobin is required
  • Traction
    • In most cases, a traction splint or pin will be placed in the distal femur to stabilize the fracture pre-operatively

Nonoperative

Operative

  • Indications
    • Virtually all non-pediatric cases
  • Technique
    • Anterograde intramedullary nail
    • Retrograde intramedullary nail
    • External fixation
    • Open reduction, internal fixation

Rehab and Return to Play

Rehabilitation following a femoral shaft fracture

General Rehabilitation

  • General
    • Patients should be advanced to weight bearing as tolerated as soon as possible postoperatively
    • Rehab focused on: quadriceps weakness, hip abductor weakness, anterior knee pain, and gait abnormalities[29]
    • Recovery in elderly patients is often slower due to deconditioning, sarcopenia and comorbidities
  • Weight-Bearing Progression
    • Immediate weight bearing as tolerated is safe following intramedullary nailing[30]
    • Retrospective series have reported low complication rates with immediate weight bearing
    • Biomechanical studies indicate that early loading is beneficial for fracture healing
  • Key Impairments to address
    • Include hip abduction weakness, knee extensor weakness, anterior knee pain, and gait abnormalities

Rehabilitation Phases

  • Phase 1 (Weeks 0–6)[31]
    • Focus on: Weight-bearing tolerance, Controlling knee effusion, Achieving quadriceps control, Initiating hip abduction strengthening
    • Early strengthening begins immediately (not delayed for arbitrary timelines)
    • Pediatric outcomes: 88% still use walking aids at 6 weeks, 69% able to navigate stairs
  • Phase 2 (Weeks 6–12)[32]
    • Continue progressive strengthening
    • Emphasis on: Normalizing gait patterns
    • Pediatric outcomes by 12 weeks: Only 25% require walking aids, 100% able to manage stairs
  • Phase 3 (3–6 months)
    • Focus on: Advanced strengthening, Sport-specific training
    • Outcomes: Gait patterns normalize in most patients by 6 months
    • Persistent deficits: Decreased hip and knee extension moments compared to controls
    • Pediatric data: 3D gait analysis confirms normalization of gait patterns at 6 months
  • Phase 4 (6–12 months)
    • Focus on: Return-to-sport progression
    • Monitoring: Strength deficits, Functional performance

Return to Play

  • Timeline
    • Return to sport in professional athletes typically occurs at 7-13 months post-injury[33]
    • Full return to previous performance levels achievable
    • No subjective complaints at 25-month follow-up
  • Return to Play Criteria[34]
    • Anatomical and functional healing confirmed radiographically and clinically
    • Restoration of sport-specific skills through progressive functional testing
    • Psychosocial readiness including absence of fear of reinjury and kinesiophobia
    • Adequate strength particularly of quadriceps and hip abductors
    • Normalized gait mechanics and movement patterns
    • No undue risk to other participants
    • Compliance with governing body regulations

Complications

Summary of complications in intramedullary nail- ing of open grade III femoral shaft fractures[35]
Nonunion in the right femur at postoperative 8 months. A: X-ray showed traumatic fracture at distal femur; B: Postoperative film showed unreamed nailing but unsatisfactory reduction; C: hypertrophic nonunion were found 8 months following surgery.[36]

Prognosis

  • General
    • Prognosis after femoral shaft fracture is generally favorable with intramedullary nailing, achieving union rates of 93-99%
    • Residual disability, pain, and functional deficits persist in a significant proportion even years after injury
    • Patients with definitive fixation have improved outcomes, fewer complications, and reduced mortality (need citation)
  • Surgical Technique
    • Reamed nailing (anterograde and retrograde) demonstrate 99-100% union rates[37]
  • Union Rates and Timing
    • Femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing achieve union at a mean time of 4.4-5.4 months[38]
    • Nonunion occurs in 2.8-11.3% of shaft fractures, with rates varying based on fracture complexity and patient factor
  • Mortality
    • Isolated bilateral femur fracture is associated with 9.8% all-cause mortality[39]
    • bilateral fractures with associated injuries had a mortality of 31.6%
    • In a separate study, isolated femur fracture was associated with a 1.4% mortality rate[40]
    • Delays in care more than 48 hours increase mortality by as much as 5-fold
  • Functional Outcomes
    • Despite high union rates, residual functional deficits persist long-term
    • At mean 7.8-year follow-up, 17% of patients report moderate to severe pain
    • At 12 months, 72% of patients with union return to work, though 54% continue to have pain

Complications

  • Heterotopic Ossification
    • Up to 25% of cases, rarely causes symptoms (need citation)
  • Pudendal Nerve Injury
    • Up to 15% of cases[41]
  • Femoral Artery Injury
  • Femoral Nerve Injury
  • Malunion
  • Rotational malalignment
  • Nonunion
    • Most frequent complication requiring reoperation, occurring in 2.8-11.3% of femoral shaft fractures[42]
  • Delayed union
    • Delayed union occurs in 10-33% of cases depending on fracture complexity[43]
  • Infection[44]
    • Deep infection rates are low (1-4%) with modern intramedullary nailing techniques
    • Surgical site infections occurred in 4% of patients in recent series
  • Weakness
  • Fat Emboli Syndrome/ Thromboembolic Complications
    • Thromboembolism is documented in 5-15.2% of patients, with pulmonary emboli being a notable postoperative complication[45]
  • Pain syndromes[45]
    • Prior to nail removal, hip pain occurs in 26% and knee pain in 20% of patients
    • These pain complaints usually disappear after nail removal
  • Respiratory Complications
    • Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs in approximately 3% of case

See Also


References


  1. Hellwinkel, Justin E. "Innovations in treatment of femoral fractures throughout history." Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation 5.2 (2024).
  2. Bartoníček, J. "The history of fractures of the proximal femur: the contribution of the Dublin surgical school in the first half of the 19th century." The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume 84.6 (2002): 795-797.
  3. Bartonícek, Jan. "Proximal femur fractures: the pioneer era of 1818 to 1925." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007) 419 (2004): 306-310.
  4. Enninghorst N, McDougall D, Evans JA, Sisak K, Balogh ZJ. Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jun;74(6):1516-20.
  5. Keeney JA, Ingari JV, Mentzer KD, Powell ET. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in an echelon III facility. Mil Med. 2009 Feb;174(2):124-8.
  6. Koskiniotis, Alexandros E., et al. "“Terrible Triad” Injury in an Adolescent Patient With a High-Energy Femoral Shaft Fracture: A Case Report." Cureus 17.3 (2025).
  7. Image courtesy of orthoinfo.aaos.org
  8. Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Al Dabbagh Z, Jansson KA. National data of 6409 Swedish inpatients with femoral shaft fractures: stable incidence between 1998 and 2004. Injury. 2009 Mar;40(3):304-8.
  9. Swiontkowski, Marc F., et al. “Ipsilateral Fracture of the Femoral Neck and Shaft.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 66, no. 2, 1984, pp. 260–68.
  10. Gustilo, Ramon B., and John T. Anderson. “Prevention of Infection in the Treatment of One Thousand and Twenty-Five Open Fractures of Long Bones.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 58, no. 4, 1976, pp. 453–58.
  11. Walker, J. L., and J. C. Kennedy. “Occult Knee Ligament Injuries Associated with Femoral Shaft Fractures.” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, 1980, pp. 172–74.
  12. Tornetta, Paul, et al. “Compartment Syndrome Associated with Femoral Fracture.” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 370, 2000, pp. 227–33.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Brumback, Robert J., et al. “Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 74, no. 7, 1992, pp. 1061–75.
  14. Gurd, A. R., and R. I. Wilson. “The Fat Embolism Syndrome.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 56, no. 3, 1974, pp. 408–16
  15. Giannoudis, Peter V., et al. “Fat Embolism: The Re-Emergence of a Clinical Problem.” Injury, vol. 37, Suppl 4, 2006, pp. S3–S7.
  16. Krettek, Christian, et al. “Femoral Shaft Fractures.” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 33, no. 1, 2002, pp. 1–12.
  17. Court-Brown, Charles M., and Margaret M. McQueen. “Global Forum: Fractures in Older Adults.” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 98, no. 9, 2016, p. e36.
  18. Burr, David B., and Matthew R. Allen. Basic and Applied Bone Biology. Elsevier, 2019.
  19. 19.0 19.1 Koval, Kenneth J., and Joseph D. Zuckerman. Handbook of Fractures. 6th ed., Wolters Kluwer, 2020.
  20. Shane, Elizabeth, et al. “Atypical Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures.” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 18, 2011, pp. 1728–37.
  21. Khodaee, Morteza, Anna L. Waterbrook, and Matthew Gammons, eds. Sports-related fractures, dislocations and trauma: advanced on-and off-field management. Springer Nature, 2020.
  22. Salminen, Sari T., et al. "Population based epidemiologic and morphologic study of femoral shaft fractures." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007) 372 (2000): 241-249.
  23. Halvorson, Jason J., et al. "Vascular injury associated with extremity trauma: initial diagnosis and management." JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 19.8 (2011): 495-504.
  24. Lee, James T., et al. "ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Major Blunt Trauma: Update 2025." Journal of the American College of Radiology (2026).
  25. Rogers, Nathan B., et al. "Improving the diagnosis of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: a new imaging protocol." JBJS 102.4 (2020): 309-314.
  26. Schmid, Gordian Lukas, et al. "The Investigation of suspected fracture—a comparison of ultrasound with conventional imaging: Systematic review and meta-analysis." Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 114.45 (2017): 757.
  27. Yang, Shuo, et al. "Effect of the degree of displacement of the third fragment on healing of femoral shaft fracture treated by intramedullary nailing." Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 17.1 (2022): 380.
  28. Gupta, Anupam, et al. "Femoral shaft fracture in post-polio syndrome patients: case series from a level-I trauma center and review of literature." Indian journal of orthopaedics 56.8 (2022): 1339-1346.
  29. Paterno, Mark V., and Michael T. Archdeacon. "Is there a standard rehabilitation protocol after femoral intramedullary nailing?." Journal of orthopaedic trauma 23 (2009): S39-S46.
  30. Kubiak, Erik N., et al. "Early weight bearing after lower extremity fractures in adults." JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 21.12 (2013): 727-738.
  31. Paterno, Mark V., et al. "Early rehabilitation following surgical fixation of a femoral shaft fracture." Physical therapy 86.4 (2006): 558-572.
  32. Flinck, Marianne, and Jacques Riad. "Recovery of gait in children and adolescents after pediatric femoral shaft fracture treated with intramedullary nail fixation: a longitudinal prospective study." Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 44.1 (2024): 1-6.
  33. Sikka, Robby, et al. "Femur fractures in professional athletes: a case series." Journal of athletic training 50.4 (2015): 442-448.
  34. Herring, Stanley A. "The team physician and return-to-play issues: a consensus statement." Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 34.7 (2002): 1212-1214.
  35. Singh, D., et al. "Open grade III fractures of femoral shaft: outcome after early reamed intramedullary nailing." Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 97.5 (2011): 506-511.
  36. Ma, Yong-Gang, et al. "Surgical factors contributing to nonunion in femoral shaft fracture following intramedullary nailing." Chinese Journal of Traumatology 19.02 (2016): 109-112.
  37. Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Mar-Apr;15(3):161-9.
  38. el Moumni, Mostafa, et al. "Long-term functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures." Injury 43.7 (2012): 1154-1158.
  39. Willett K, Al-Khateeb H, Kotnis R, Bouamra O, Lecky F. Risk of mortality: the relationship with associated injuries and fracture treatment methods in patients with unilateral or bilateral femoral shaft fractures. J Trauma. 2010 Aug;69(2):405-10
  40. Cantu RV, Graves SC, Spratt KF. In-hospital mortality from femoral shaft fracture depends on the initial delay to fracture fixation and Injury Severity Score: a retrospective cohort study from the NTDB 2002-2006. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jun;76(6):1433-40.
  41. Brumback RJ, Ellison TS, Molligan H, Molligan DJ, Mahaffey S, Schmidhauser C. Pudendal nerve palsy complicating intramedullary nailing of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Dec;74(10):1450-5.
  42. Yoon, Yong-Cheol, et al. "Antegrade nailing in femoral shaft fracture patients-comparison of outcomes of isolated fractures, multiple fractures and severely injured patients." Injury 52.10 (2021): 3068-3074.
  43. Tay, Wei-Han, et al. "Health outcomes of delayed union and nonunion of femoral and tibial shaft fractures." Injury 45.10 (2014): 1653-1658.
  44. Testa, Gianluca, et al. "Definitive treatment of femoral shaft fractures: comparison between anterograde intramedullary nailing and monoaxial external fixation." Journal of clinical medicine 8.8 (2019): 1119.
  45. 45.0 45.1 Bråten, M., T. Terjesen, and I. Rossvoll. "Femoral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. A follow-up study focusing on problems related to the method." Injury 26.6 (1995): 379-383.
Created by:
John Kiel on 29 June 2020 02:22:23
Authors:
Last edited:
31 March 2026 20:23:30
Categories:
Lower Extremity | Trauma | Hip | Thigh | Fractures | Acute | Featured