Femoral Shaft Fracture
Other Names
- Femur Fracture
- Femoral Diaphysis fracture
- Atypical Femoral Shaft Fracture
- Atypical Femoral Fracture (AFF)
- Femoral Diaphyseal Fracture
- Diaphyseal Femur Fracture
- Midshaft Femur Fracture
- Femoral Midshaft Fracture
- Femoral Bone Shaft Fracture
Background
- This page refers to fractures of the femoral shaft or diaphysis
History
- Hippocrates (c. 460–370 BCE), who described long-bone fractures (including the femur) and their management using traction and splinting techniques[1]
- More detailed anatomic and clinical descriptions of femoral fractures emerged in the early 1800s, particularly among European surgeons[2]
- The first documented operative attempt was in the 1850s by Bernhard von Langenbeck[3]
Epidemiology
- Bimodal distribution in young healthy males (15-35) and elderly females (Over 60)
- Worldwide incidence between 10 and 21 per 100,000 per years[4]
- Approximately 2% of femoral shaft fractures are open[5]
Introduction




General
- Femoral shaft fractures are significant injuries affecting the diaphyseal region of the femur
- Most commonly seen in violent trauma in young males and minor trauma in geriatic patients
- Diagnosis is suspected clinically and confirmed radiographically
- Intramedullary nailing represents the gold standard treatment for most adult femoral shaft fractures
Terminology
- Classically defined as the region from 5 cm below the lesser trochanter to the metaphyseal flare proximal to the femoral condyles
- Separate from Femoral Neck Fractures and Distal Femur Fractures which are discussed elsewhere
Etiology
- High energy trauma most common in younger patients
- Typically motor vehicle crash (87%), fall from elevation[8]
- Low energy trauma in elderly patients
- Most commonly fall from standing, pathologic
Anatomy of the Femur
- Largest, strongest bone in the body
- Functions
- Supports body weight and transmits forces from the pelvis to the tibia during standing, walking, and running
- Acts as a long lever arm to facilitate hip and knee motion, enabling efficient locomotion
- Provides extensive attachment points for major muscle groups (quadriceps, hamstrings, adductors, gluteals) that control lower extremity movement
- Contains bone marrow for blood cell production and contributes to protection of surrounding neurovascular structures
- Thigh Anatomy Main
- Anterior Compartment: Quadriceps Femoris, Sartorius
- Medial Compartment: Gracilis, Adductor Longus, Adductor Brevis, Adductor Magnus, Obturator Externus, Pectineus
- Posterior Compartment: Biceps Femoris, Semitendinosus, Semimembranosus
Associated Injuries
- Orthopedic
- Femoral Neck Fracture[9]
- Tibial Shaft Fracture
- Acetabular Fracture
- Open fracture with soft tissue injuries[10]
- Knee ligament injuries (e.g., ACL, PCL)[11]
- Patella Fracture
- Acute Compartment Syndrome[12]
- Quadriceps Muscle injury or necrosis
- Other
- Polytrauma[13]
- Hemorrhagic shock[13]
- Fat embolism syndrome[14]
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome[15]
- Femoral artery, sciatic nerve injuries[16]
Risk Factors
Bone Quality & Metabolic Factors
- Osteoporosis[17]
- Osteopenia[18]
- Vitamin D deficiency
- Chronic Kidney Disease (renal osteodystrophy)
Pathologic Bone Conditions
- Primary bone tumors (e.g., osteosarcoma)
- Metastatic disease (e.g., breast, prostate, lung cancer)
- Paget disease of bone[19]
- Bone cysts or benign lesions
Medications
- Long-term corticosteroid use
- Bisphosphonate-associated atypical femur fractures[20]
- Anticonvulsants (via effects on bone metabolism)
Repetitive Stress / Overuse
- Military recruits[19]
- Endurance athletes (e.g., long-distance runners)
- Sudden increase in training intensity (stress fractures of femoral shaft)
Demographic & Lifestyle Factors
- Male sex (higher exposure to high-energy trauma)
- Advanced age (increased fragility risk)
- Tobacco Use Disorder (impaired bone quality and healing)
- Alcohol Use Disorder (fall risk + bone health impact)
Differential Diagnosis
Differential Diagnosis Thigh Pain
- Fractures
- Muscle and Tendon
- Neurological
- Other
Differential Diagnosis Hip Pain
- Fractures And Dislocations
- Arthropathies
- Muscle and Tendon Injuries
- Bursopathies
- Ligament Injuries
- Neuropathies
- Other
- Pediatric Pathology
- Transient Synovitis of the Hip
- Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH)
- Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease
- Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE)
- Avulsion Fractures of the Ilium (Iliac Crest, ASIS, AIIS)
- Ischial Tuberosity Avulsion Fracture
- Avulsion Fractures of the Trochanters (Greater, Lesser)
- Iliac Apophysitis (AIIS, ASIS, Iliac Crest)
- Idiopathic Chondrolysis of the Hip
Clinical Features

History
- Characterize the mechanism of injury and trauma, including any other potential injuries[22]
- Patient endorses severe thigh pain, inability to weight bear
- Patients often endorse swelling, bruising
- Often there is a visible deformity or limb shortening
Physical Exam: Thigh Exam Main
- Tense, swollen, edematous thigh due to bleeding into fracture space
- Deformity and abnormal limb positioning may or may not be present
- Leg may be internally/ externally rotated, shortened
- Tenderness at fracture site
- A thorough neurovascular exam must be performed
- Vascualr injuries occur in less than 1% of all long bone fracutres[23]
Special Tests
- There are no dedicated special physical examination maneuvers specific for diagnosing femoral shaft fractures
Evaluation


Radiographs
- Standard Radiographs Femur
- Initial imaging modality of choice and sufficient to make the diagnosis
- Typically includes AP and lateral views
- Should also obtain Standard Radiographs Hip, Standard Radiographs Knee of ipsilateral limb
CT
- Typically not indicated
- Can be used for fracture characterization, detection of radiographically occult fractures, or operative planning[24]
- Can be useful for ipsilateral femoral neck fractures
MRI
- Not indicated for femoral shaft fracture
- May be considered for ipsilateral femoral neck fractures[25]
Ultrasound
- Not routinely used in femoral shaft fracture evaluation
- Can detect long bone fractures with sensitivity 64-100%, specificity 79-100%[26]
- May be able to evaluate for hemorrhage or hematoma in the setting of undifferentiated hypotension
Classification
Winquist and Hansen Classification
- Type 0: No comminution
- Type I: Insignificant amount of comminution
- Type II: Greater than 50% cortical contact
- Type III: Less than 50% cortical contact
- Type IV: Segmental fracture with no contact between proximal and distal fragment
OTA Classification
- 32A: Simple
- A1: Spiral
- A2: Oblique, angle > 30 degrees
- A3: Transverse, angle < 30 degrees
- 32B: Wedge
- B1: Spiral wedge
- B2: Bending wedge
- B3: Fragmented wedge
- 32C: Complex
- C1: Spiral
- C2: Segmental
- C3: Irregular
Management


Acute
- Patients with femur fractures should be assessed following Advanced Trauma Life (ATLS) Support
- Critical to identify other co-occurring and potentially life threatening injuries
- It is possible to hemorrhage 1-3L of blood into the thigh following a femur fracture
- Careful monitoring of hemodynamic static and hemoglobin is required
- Traction
- In most cases, a traction splint or pin will be placed in the distal femur to stabilize the fracture pre-operatively
Nonoperative
- Indications
- Rare
- Pediatric patients
- Patients who are poor surgical candidates
- Immobilization
Operative
- Indications
- Virtually all non-pediatric cases
- Technique
- Anterograde intramedullary nail
- Retrograde intramedullary nail
- External fixation
- Open reduction, internal fixation
Rehab and Return to Play

General Rehabilitation
- General
- Patients should be advanced to weight bearing as tolerated as soon as possible postoperatively
- Rehab focused on: quadriceps weakness, hip abductor weakness, anterior knee pain, and gait abnormalities[29]
- Recovery in elderly patients is often slower due to deconditioning, sarcopenia and comorbidities
- Weight-Bearing Progression
- Immediate weight bearing as tolerated is safe following intramedullary nailing[30]
- Retrospective series have reported low complication rates with immediate weight bearing
- Biomechanical studies indicate that early loading is beneficial for fracture healing
- Key Impairments to address
- Include hip abduction weakness, knee extensor weakness, anterior knee pain, and gait abnormalities
Rehabilitation Phases
- Phase 1 (Weeks 0–6)[31]
- Focus on: Weight-bearing tolerance, Controlling knee effusion, Achieving quadriceps control, Initiating hip abduction strengthening
- Early strengthening begins immediately (not delayed for arbitrary timelines)
- Pediatric outcomes: 88% still use walking aids at 6 weeks, 69% able to navigate stairs
- Phase 2 (Weeks 6–12)[32]
- Continue progressive strengthening
- Emphasis on: Normalizing gait patterns
- Pediatric outcomes by 12 weeks: Only 25% require walking aids, 100% able to manage stairs
- Phase 3 (3–6 months)
- Focus on: Advanced strengthening, Sport-specific training
- Outcomes: Gait patterns normalize in most patients by 6 months
- Persistent deficits: Decreased hip and knee extension moments compared to controls
- Pediatric data: 3D gait analysis confirms normalization of gait patterns at 6 months
- Phase 4 (6–12 months)
- Focus on: Return-to-sport progression
- Monitoring: Strength deficits, Functional performance
Return to Play
- Timeline
- Return to sport in professional athletes typically occurs at 7-13 months post-injury[33]
- Full return to previous performance levels achievable
- No subjective complaints at 25-month follow-up
- Return to Play Criteria[34]
- Anatomical and functional healing confirmed radiographically and clinically
- Restoration of sport-specific skills through progressive functional testing
- Psychosocial readiness including absence of fear of reinjury and kinesiophobia
- Adequate strength particularly of quadriceps and hip abductors
- Normalized gait mechanics and movement patterns
- No undue risk to other participants
- Compliance with governing body regulations
Complications


Prognosis
- General
- Prognosis after femoral shaft fracture is generally favorable with intramedullary nailing, achieving union rates of 93-99%
- Residual disability, pain, and functional deficits persist in a significant proportion even years after injury
- Patients with definitive fixation have improved outcomes, fewer complications, and reduced mortality (need citation)
- Surgical Technique
- Reamed nailing (anterograde and retrograde) demonstrate 99-100% union rates[37]
- Union Rates and Timing
- Femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing achieve union at a mean time of 4.4-5.4 months[38]
- Nonunion occurs in 2.8-11.3% of shaft fractures, with rates varying based on fracture complexity and patient factor
- Mortality
- Isolated bilateral femur fracture is associated with 9.8% all-cause mortality[39]
- bilateral fractures with associated injuries had a mortality of 31.6%
- In a separate study, isolated femur fracture was associated with a 1.4% mortality rate[40]
- Delays in care more than 48 hours increase mortality by as much as 5-fold
- Functional Outcomes
- Despite high union rates, residual functional deficits persist long-term
- At mean 7.8-year follow-up, 17% of patients report moderate to severe pain
- At 12 months, 72% of patients with union return to work, though 54% continue to have pain
Complications
- Heterotopic Ossification
- Up to 25% of cases, rarely causes symptoms (need citation)
- Pudendal Nerve Injury
- Up to 15% of cases[41]
- Femoral Artery Injury
- Femoral Nerve Injury
- Malunion
- Rotational malalignment
- Nonunion
- Most frequent complication requiring reoperation, occurring in 2.8-11.3% of femoral shaft fractures[42]
- Delayed union
- Delayed union occurs in 10-33% of cases depending on fracture complexity[43]
- Infection[44]
- Deep infection rates are low (1-4%) with modern intramedullary nailing techniques
- Surgical site infections occurred in 4% of patients in recent series
- Weakness
- Fat Emboli Syndrome/ Thromboembolic Complications
- Thromboembolism is documented in 5-15.2% of patients, with pulmonary emboli being a notable postoperative complication[45]
- Pain syndromes[45]
- Prior to nail removal, hip pain occurs in 26% and knee pain in 20% of patients
- These pain complaints usually disappear after nail removal
- Respiratory Complications
- Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurs in approximately 3% of case
See Also
References
- ↑ Hellwinkel, Justin E. "Innovations in treatment of femoral fractures throughout history." Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation 5.2 (2024).
- ↑ Bartoníček, J. "The history of fractures of the proximal femur: the contribution of the Dublin surgical school in the first half of the 19th century." The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume 84.6 (2002): 795-797.
- ↑ Bartonícek, Jan. "Proximal femur fractures: the pioneer era of 1818 to 1925." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007) 419 (2004): 306-310.
- ↑ Enninghorst N, McDougall D, Evans JA, Sisak K, Balogh ZJ. Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jun;74(6):1516-20.
- ↑ Keeney JA, Ingari JV, Mentzer KD, Powell ET. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in an echelon III facility. Mil Med. 2009 Feb;174(2):124-8.
- ↑ Koskiniotis, Alexandros E., et al. "“Terrible Triad” Injury in an Adolescent Patient With a High-Energy Femoral Shaft Fracture: A Case Report." Cureus 17.3 (2025).
- ↑ Image courtesy of orthoinfo.aaos.org
- ↑ Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Al Dabbagh Z, Jansson KA. National data of 6409 Swedish inpatients with femoral shaft fractures: stable incidence between 1998 and 2004. Injury. 2009 Mar;40(3):304-8.
- ↑ Swiontkowski, Marc F., et al. “Ipsilateral Fracture of the Femoral Neck and Shaft.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 66, no. 2, 1984, pp. 260–68.
- ↑ Gustilo, Ramon B., and John T. Anderson. “Prevention of Infection in the Treatment of One Thousand and Twenty-Five Open Fractures of Long Bones.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 58, no. 4, 1976, pp. 453–58.
- ↑ Walker, J. L., and J. C. Kennedy. “Occult Knee Ligament Injuries Associated with Femoral Shaft Fractures.” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 8, no. 3, 1980, pp. 172–74.
- ↑ Tornetta, Paul, et al. “Compartment Syndrome Associated with Femoral Fracture.” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 370, 2000, pp. 227–33.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 Brumback, Robert J., et al. “Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 74, no. 7, 1992, pp. 1061–75.
- ↑ Gurd, A. R., and R. I. Wilson. “The Fat Embolism Syndrome.” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 56, no. 3, 1974, pp. 408–16
- ↑ Giannoudis, Peter V., et al. “Fat Embolism: The Re-Emergence of a Clinical Problem.” Injury, vol. 37, Suppl 4, 2006, pp. S3–S7.
- ↑ Krettek, Christian, et al. “Femoral Shaft Fractures.” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 33, no. 1, 2002, pp. 1–12.
- ↑ Court-Brown, Charles M., and Margaret M. McQueen. “Global Forum: Fractures in Older Adults.” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 98, no. 9, 2016, p. e36.
- ↑ Burr, David B., and Matthew R. Allen. Basic and Applied Bone Biology. Elsevier, 2019.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 Koval, Kenneth J., and Joseph D. Zuckerman. Handbook of Fractures. 6th ed., Wolters Kluwer, 2020.
- ↑ Shane, Elizabeth, et al. “Atypical Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures.” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 18, 2011, pp. 1728–37.
- ↑ Khodaee, Morteza, Anna L. Waterbrook, and Matthew Gammons, eds. Sports-related fractures, dislocations and trauma: advanced on-and off-field management. Springer Nature, 2020.
- ↑ Salminen, Sari T., et al. "Population based epidemiologic and morphologic study of femoral shaft fractures." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007) 372 (2000): 241-249.
- ↑ Halvorson, Jason J., et al. "Vascular injury associated with extremity trauma: initial diagnosis and management." JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 19.8 (2011): 495-504.
- ↑ Lee, James T., et al. "ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Major Blunt Trauma: Update 2025." Journal of the American College of Radiology (2026).
- ↑ Rogers, Nathan B., et al. "Improving the diagnosis of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: a new imaging protocol." JBJS 102.4 (2020): 309-314.
- ↑ Schmid, Gordian Lukas, et al. "The Investigation of suspected fracture—a comparison of ultrasound with conventional imaging: Systematic review and meta-analysis." Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 114.45 (2017): 757.
- ↑ Yang, Shuo, et al. "Effect of the degree of displacement of the third fragment on healing of femoral shaft fracture treated by intramedullary nailing." Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 17.1 (2022): 380.
- ↑ Gupta, Anupam, et al. "Femoral shaft fracture in post-polio syndrome patients: case series from a level-I trauma center and review of literature." Indian journal of orthopaedics 56.8 (2022): 1339-1346.
- ↑ Paterno, Mark V., and Michael T. Archdeacon. "Is there a standard rehabilitation protocol after femoral intramedullary nailing?." Journal of orthopaedic trauma 23 (2009): S39-S46.
- ↑ Kubiak, Erik N., et al. "Early weight bearing after lower extremity fractures in adults." JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 21.12 (2013): 727-738.
- ↑ Paterno, Mark V., et al. "Early rehabilitation following surgical fixation of a femoral shaft fracture." Physical therapy 86.4 (2006): 558-572.
- ↑ Flinck, Marianne, and Jacques Riad. "Recovery of gait in children and adolescents after pediatric femoral shaft fracture treated with intramedullary nail fixation: a longitudinal prospective study." Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 44.1 (2024): 1-6.
- ↑ Sikka, Robby, et al. "Femur fractures in professional athletes: a case series." Journal of athletic training 50.4 (2015): 442-448.
- ↑ Herring, Stanley A. "The team physician and return-to-play issues: a consensus statement." Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 34.7 (2002): 1212-1214.
- ↑ Singh, D., et al. "Open grade III fractures of femoral shaft: outcome after early reamed intramedullary nailing." Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research 97.5 (2011): 506-511.
- ↑ Ma, Yong-Gang, et al. "Surgical factors contributing to nonunion in femoral shaft fracture following intramedullary nailing." Chinese Journal of Traumatology 19.02 (2016): 109-112.
- ↑ Ricci WM, Bellabarba C, Evanoff B, Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R. Retrograde versus antegrade nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001 Mar-Apr;15(3):161-9.
- ↑ el Moumni, Mostafa, et al. "Long-term functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures." Injury 43.7 (2012): 1154-1158.
- ↑ Willett K, Al-Khateeb H, Kotnis R, Bouamra O, Lecky F. Risk of mortality: the relationship with associated injuries and fracture treatment methods in patients with unilateral or bilateral femoral shaft fractures. J Trauma. 2010 Aug;69(2):405-10
- ↑ Cantu RV, Graves SC, Spratt KF. In-hospital mortality from femoral shaft fracture depends on the initial delay to fracture fixation and Injury Severity Score: a retrospective cohort study from the NTDB 2002-2006. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jun;76(6):1433-40.
- ↑ Brumback RJ, Ellison TS, Molligan H, Molligan DJ, Mahaffey S, Schmidhauser C. Pudendal nerve palsy complicating intramedullary nailing of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Dec;74(10):1450-5.
- ↑ Yoon, Yong-Cheol, et al. "Antegrade nailing in femoral shaft fracture patients-comparison of outcomes of isolated fractures, multiple fractures and severely injured patients." Injury 52.10 (2021): 3068-3074.
- ↑ Tay, Wei-Han, et al. "Health outcomes of delayed union and nonunion of femoral and tibial shaft fractures." Injury 45.10 (2014): 1653-1658.
- ↑ Testa, Gianluca, et al. "Definitive treatment of femoral shaft fractures: comparison between anterograde intramedullary nailing and monoaxial external fixation." Journal of clinical medicine 8.8 (2019): 1119.
- ↑ 45.0 45.1 Bråten, M., T. Terjesen, and I. Rossvoll. "Femoral shaft fractures treated by intramedullary nailing. A follow-up study focusing on problems related to the method." Injury 26.6 (1995): 379-383.