We need you! See something you could improve? Make an edit and help improve WikSM for everyone.
Infectious Mononucleosis
From WikiSM
Other Names
- Mono
- Kissing virus
- Kissing disease
Background
- This page covers Infectious mononucleosis (IM), often referred to as 'mono'
History
Epidemiology
- It is estimated that 30-50% of college freshman are susceptible to infection
- Annual incidence is 1-3%[1]
- Although most commonly seen in teenagers, eventually infects up to 90% of all adults[2]
Pathophysiology
- Viral syndrome characterized by pharyngitis, posterior cervical lymphadenopathy, fatigue, fever, abdominal pain and sometimes rash
- Most commonly caused by primary Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection in teenagers
- Transmission occurs primarily through oral secretions, hence the popular description "kissing disease"
- Also shared through coughing, sneezing, close contact
- Less commonly through blood, solid organ transplantation, hematopoeitic cell transplant
- EBV is a member of the herpes virus family
- Less commonly caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV)
- General
- Illness is generally self limited
- Classic triad of fever, pharyngitis and lymphadenopathy
- Incubation period is between 30-50 days, which makes identifying initial exposure challenging
- Patients who are immunocompromised can develop severe symptoms
- No season variation
- Acutely, increases risk of splenomegaly and rupture
- Chronically, EBV is associated with certain cancers and autoimmune disease
Risk Factors
- Needs to be updated
Differential Diagnosis
- Non-EBV Viral Pharyngitis
- Strep Pharyngitis
- Post Nasal Drip
- Allergic Reaction
Clinical Features
- General
- History
- Incubation period is approximately 6 weeks
- May have a viral prodrome of fever, headache, malaise for up to 3 weeks
- Patients endorse sore throat, cervical lymphadenopathy, fever, tonsillar enlargement
- Physical Exam
- Pharygeal inflammation (80%)
- Palatal petechiae (25%)
- Rash on trunk and upper extremity (10-40%), more common if treated with antibiotics
- Splenomegaly (up to 50%, need citation)
- Ability to detect splenomegaly on exam is limited
- Poor sensitivity, specificity and inter-rate reliability (need citation)
- Older adults may develop jaundice
- Less common: periorbital edema, CNS complications, myocarditis
- Special Tests
Evaluation
Laboratory
- CBC shows nonspecific leukocytosis, lymphocytosis
- Heterophile antibody test positive
- LFTs may or may not bee elevated
Imaging Spleen
- CT, MRI and US have been used
- CT
- Benefits: Greater detail, better quantifcation of splenic size
- Limitations: cost, radiation exposure, time
- Indicated if splenic rupture is suspected
- US
- Readily available, inexpensive, no radiation
- Technique
- Measure length, breadth, thickness
- Multiply all 3 dimensions, divide by 27[3]
- Interpret an individual measurement with caution. Likely need serial measurements
- Clear guidance on normative data not well established
Classification
- N/A
Management
Hoagland's Criteria
- WBC: at least 50% lymphocytes and at least 10% atypical lymphocytes[4]
- Presence of fever, pharyngitis, and adenopathy
- Confirmatory serologic testing
- Approximately 50% of patients meet
Nonoperative
- No specific treatment, self limited illness
- Supportive treatment
- Sore throat
- Salt water gargles, anesthetic throat lozenges or sprays, or gargling with 2% lidocaine solution
- Acyclovir
- Short term supression of viral shedding, no significant clinical benefit[5]
- Oral Corticosteroids
- Some benefit for severe pharyngeal edema
- Consider in athletes with: impending airway obstruction, hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, or myocarditis
- Chochrane review: decreased symptoms for 12 hours, benefits subsided at 2-4 days[6]
- Avoid
- Activity/ sports until cleared by physician
- If given penicillin, up to 90% of patients will develop a maculopapular rash (need citation)
- Aspirin due to risk of bleeding, thrombocytopenia
- Acetaminophen, alcohol due to hepatotoxicity
- Isolate from others if possible to minimize exposure and risk
Operative
- If splenic rupture, splenectomy
- Some case reports of nonoperative management of stable splenic injury
- Discuss with surgical staff if patient is stable
Rehab and Return to Play
Rehabilitation
- No specific rehabilitation
- Athlete may require conditioning before return to sport
Return to Play
- Return too quickly increases risk of splenic injury
- Complicated by lack of clear correlation between splenomegaly and risk of rupture
- Unreliability of physical exam also a challenge
- Risk not well understood in athletes, estimated to be 0.1-0.5% extrapolating from general population (need citation)
- Up to 86% of ruptures are atraumatic
- Sylvester et al: Less than 75% of ruptures occur before 21 days, most occur by 31 days[7]
- Case reports of splenic rupture up to 7 weeks (need citation)
- Most physicians hold athletes for 4-6 weeks
- Consider light, noncontact activities 3 weeks from symptom onset[8]
- Return to contact activities is controversial
- RTP must be individualized
- Important to discuss risk/benefit with athlete
Complications
- Splenic Rupture
- Myocarditis
- CNS
See Also
References
- ↑ Brodsky AL, Heath CW. Infectious mononucleosis; epidemiological patterns at United States colleges and universities. Am J Epidemiol. 1972;96:87–93.
- ↑ Baumgarten E, Herbst H, Schmitt M, et al. Life-threatening infectious mononucleosis: is it correlated with virus-induced T cell proliferation? J Clin Infect Dis. 1994;19:152–156.
- ↑ Pietri H, Boscaini M. Determination of a splenic volumetric index by ultrasonic scanning. J Ultrasound Med. 1984;3:19–23.
- ↑ Ebell MH. Epstein-Barr virus infectious mononucleosis. Am Fam Physician. 2004;70:1279–1287.
- ↑ Torre D, Tambini R. Acyclovir for treatment of infectious mononucleosis: a meta-analysis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1999;31:543.
- ↑ Candy B, Hotopf M. Steroids for symptom control in infectious mononucleosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD004402.
- ↑ Sylvester, J. E., Buchanan, B. K., Paradise, S. L., Yauger, J. J., & Beutler, A. I. (2019). Association of Splenic Rupture and Infectious Mononucleosis: A Retrospective Analysis and Review of Return-to-Play Recommendations. Sports Health, 11(6), 543–549.
- ↑ Putukian, Margot, et al. "Mononucleosis and athletic participation: an evidence-based subject review." Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 18.4 (2008): 309-315.
Created by:
John Kiel on 13 June 2019 10:35:35
Authors:
Last edited:
4 May 2020 19:52:43
Categories: