Leg Length Discrepancy
Other Names
- Leg Length Discrepancy
- Limb Length Discrepancy
- Acquired Leg Length Discrepancy
- Congenital Leg Length Discrepancy
- Idiopathic Leg Length Discrepancy
- Anisomelia
- Functional Leg Length Discrepancy
Background
- This page refers to leg length discrepancy (LLD)
History
- Needs to be updated
Epidemiology: Prevalence
- Prevalence ≥ 1 cm
- Prevalence ≥ 1.5 cm
- Among military recruits, leg length discrepancy of >1.5 cm was measured in 4% of cases[3]
- Prevalence ≥ 2 cm
- Not well established
Epidemiology: Incidence
- Incidence ≥ 2 cm
- French study found one per 1000 population had orthopedic treatment for LLD 2 cm[4]
Introduction




General
- Condition in which paired lower extremity limbs have a noticeably unequal length
- Almost always the result of the shortening of one leg
- Extraordinarily common however clinical significance is a matter of debate
- Diagnosis is clinical and confirmed with radiographs
- Widely accepted as a clinical condition, however little consensus in treatment
- Controversial among researchers and clinicians includes extent to clinical significance, prevalence, accuracy of measurement, effect of LLD on function, role in numerous MSK conditions
Etiology: Acquired
- Primary
- As a result of loss of bone
- Secondary
- Traumatic or infectious epiphyseal injury in growing patients
- Paralytic such as cerebral palsy, polio
Etiology: Congenital
- Often termed idiopathic, meaning no other clear cause can be attributed
- Affected leg is growing continuously slower than the normal leg[8]
- Examples
- Hemihypertrophy
- Dysplasias
- Proximal femoral focal deficiency
- Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
- Unilateral clubfoot
Leg Elongation
- Very rare, not the focus of this page
- Associated with: hemihyperplasia (formerly hemihypertrophy), partial gigantism, Klippel-Trénaunay-Weber syndrome
Abnormal Growth, Hip Dysplasia and Scoliosis
- Position of attention: weight equally distributed on both legs
- LLD tilt to the side of the shortened leg
- Consequences
- Deterioration of femoral head containment
- Lateral flexion of the spine
- No data on how much of the day people are in double leg stance
- Notion that "improper loading" has significant effects has been debated
Function, Limping and Athletic Ability
- Gait analysis: LLD >1 cm can result in gait asymmetry[9]
- As discrepancy increases, asymmetry and limping increase
- In German sports
- Permanent leg length discrepancy of ≥4 cm or ≥7 cm, depending on the type of sports, are considered a disability
- Some experts suggest if LLD < 5 cm, practice sport without equalization of LLD with conservative measures
- Shoe lift can change performance of sports shoes, making it impossible to engage in activity
Back Pain and Osteoarthritis
- Unclear relationship between chronic back pain and LLD
- Multiple studies have not identified LLD as a factor promoting the development of back pain[10]
- Some patients have experienced improvement in back pain after prescribed shoe lifts
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Cohort of 3000 patients showed association between LLD and Knee OA[11]
- This was true for both the shorter and longer leg
- Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis
- Study looked at participants with LLD ≥ 2 cm[12]
- Only association was found with knee osteoarthritis
Functional Leg Length Discrepancy
- Unilateral asymmetry of the LE without any shortening of the osseous components
- Causes
- Shortening of soft tissues
- Joint contractures
- Ligamentous laxity
- Axial malalignments
- Foot biomechanics (such as excessive ankle pronation)
- Can only be detected clinically, radiographs are normal
- Can develop as abnormal motion of the hip, knee, ankle, foot in any plane of motion
Compensatory Structural Changes
- Passive structural changes can compensate for LLD up to 2 cm
- Examples
- Pelvic torsion
- Mild lumbar scoliosis
- Facet angulation
- Changes in muscle length
Associated Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Current literature is very ambiguous
- Hip Osteoarthritis
- Stress Fracture?
- Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Scoliosis
- Inefficient Gait
- Equinus contracture of the ankle
Risk Factors
- Generally includes any risk to injuries of the
- Spine
- Hip Joint
- Knee joint
Differential Diagnosis
- Needs to be updated
Clinical Features
History
- The vast majority of patients are asymptomatic
- Patients may initially present with pain in the hip, knee or spin
- Pain and fatigue
- Sensation of instability as a result of component orientation and peri-articular muscle fatigue
Physical Exam
- Block Testing/ Method
- The Patient is standing
- Place blocks under shorter limb until the pelvis is level
- Total height of blocks can infer the LLD
- Probably the best initial screening method
- Tape Measurement
- Considered controversial, accuracy has been questioned
- Typically measure from ASIS to the medial malleolus
- Recommend measuring 2 or 3 times and averaging
- Have more than one person measure
- Palpation of Bony Landmarks
- Detect at the horizontal level, see if length inequality is present
- Most commonly iliac crest or ASIS when standing
Special Tests
- Needs to be updated
Evaluation



Clinical Diagnosis
- LLD can be determined with an accuracy of ± 1 cm[15]
- See: Block method, tape measurement above
Radiographs
- Standing Full Leg Radiograph
- aka Teleroentgenogram
- Performed using the blocks method
- Only necessary when surgical correction is being planned
Classification
Potential Classification
- Mild (0-30 mm)
- Moderate (30-60mm)
- Severe (>60mm)
Pediatric
- Static
- Malunion of femur or tibia
- Progressive
- physeal growth arrest
- congenital: absolute discrepancy increases, proportion stats the same
Management

Decision to Treat
- There are no clear, evidence guidelines to determine when to initiate treatment
- The presence of a LLD does not automatically constitute an indication for treatment
- The decision to treat should be decided on an individual basis, balancing potential risks and benefits
- In growing children, measuring LLD only provides a snapshot
- Treatment decisions should be primarily based on LLD after skeletal maturity
Nonoperative
- Indications
- Reserved for patients with LLD between 2 and 5 cm[16]
- Do not need to achieve full equalization
- Growing children: correct to 1 cm
- Skeletally mature: correct to 2 cm
- Insoles
- Limited by shoe volume
- Heel Wedge
- Can correct by up to 2 cm
- Sole Lift
- Can correct up to 5 cm
- Orthosis
- Indicated for lift of ≥ 5 cm due instability with sole lift this big
- Always lead to relative equinus, loss of function of the ankle
Operative
- Indications
- >2 cm and failure of conservative measures
- Technique
- Shortening osteotomy
- Epiphysiodesis
- Lengthening
- Growth Arrest
Rehab and Return to Play
Rehabilitation
- Needs to be updated
Return to Play/ Work
- Needs to be updated
Prognosis and Complications
Prognosis
- Needs to be updated
Complications
- Incomplete arrest/ angular deformity
- Pin site infections
- Fracture
- Delayed union
- Premature cessation of lengthening
- Persistent limb length discrepancy due to error in timing of surgery
- Joint subluxation/dislocation
- Mechanical axis deviation
See Also
References
- ↑ Brady, Rebecca J., et al. "Limb length inequality: clinical implications for assessment and intervention." Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 33.5 (2003): 221-234.
- ↑ Khamis, Sam, and Eli Carmeli. "A new concept for measuring leg length discrepancy." Journal of orthopaedics 14.2 (2017): 276-280.
- ↑ Hellsing, Anna-Lisa. "Leg length inequality: a prospective study of young men during their military service." Upsala journal of medical sciences 93.3 (1988): 245-253.
- ↑ Guichet, Jean-Marc, et al. "Lower Limb-Length Discrepancy: An Epidemiologic Study." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007) 272 (1991): 235-241.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 5.2 Vogt, Björn, et al. "Leg length discrepancy—treatment indications and strategies." Deutsches Ärzteblatt International 117.24 (2020): 405.
- ↑ Image courtesy of physio-pedia.com
- ↑ Applebaum, Ariella, Adam Nessim, and Woojin Cho. "Overview and spinal implications of leg length discrepancy: narrative review." Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 13.2 (2021): 127.
- ↑ Grill, F., M. Chochole, and A. Schultz. "Pelvic tilt and leg length discrepancy." Der Orthopade 19.5 (1990): 244-262.
- ↑ Khamis, Sam, and Eli Carmeli. "Relationship and significance of gait deviations associated with limb length discrepancy: A systematic review." Gait & posture 57 (2017): 115-123.
- ↑ Back pain and osteoarthritis
- ↑ Harvey, William F., et al. "Association of leg-length inequality with knee osteoarthritis: a cohort study." Annals of internal medicine 152.5 (2010): 287-295.
- ↑ Golightly, Yvonne M., et al. "Hazard of incident and progressive knee and hip radiographic osteoarthritis and chronic joint symptoms in individuals with and without limb length inequality." The Journal of rheumatology 37.10 (2010): 2133-2140.
- ↑ Beattie, Paul, et al. "Validity of derived measurements of leg-length differences obtained by use of a tape measure." Physical therapy 70.3 (1990): 150-157.
- ↑ Case courtesy of Mohammad walid Ahmad Amin, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 96654
- ↑ Woerman, Allyn L., and Stuart A. Binder-Macleod. "Leg length discrepancy assessment: accuracy and precision in five clinical methods of evaluation." Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 5.5 (1984): 230-239.
- ↑ Hefti, Fritz, et al. "Achsen und Längen." Kinderorthopädie in der Praxis (2014): 633-660.
Created by:
John Kiel on 29 August 2024 18:49:55
Authors:
Last edited:
24 May 2025 12:49:04
Categories: