Jump to content
We need you! See something you could improve? Make an edit and help improve WikSM for everyone.

Hip Fracture

From WikiSM
(Redirected from Femoral Neck Fractures)

Other Names

  • Femoral Neck (FN) fractures
  • Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures
  • Subtrochanteric (ST) fractures

Background

  • This page refers to fractures of the proximal femur, commonly referred to as a "hip fracture"

Definition

  • The term "hip fracture" can be a misnomer
  • Included in this terminology are
    • Femoral Neck (FN) fractures
    • Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures
    • Subtrochanteric (ST) fractures
  • Not included on this page are Acetabular Fractures and Femoral Shaft Fractures, which are discussed separately

History

Epidemiology

  • 1.66 million cases annually in 1999, expected to rise to 6 million cases anually by 2050[1]
  • Socioeconomic Impact
    • 2010: Costs in US were roughly $20 billion, one of medicares top expenses[2]
  • General
    • Have a bimodal distribution caused by high energy trauma in young males and low energy trauma in older patients[3]
  • Intertrochanteric Fractures
    • Represent of 50% of hip fractures in the elderly[4]

Pathophysiology

Femoral Neck Fractures

  • Defined as fractures between the femoral head and the trochanters
  • Femoral neck has inherently poor biological healing potential
  • Most FN fractures are intracapsular where synovial fluid inhibits angiogenesis

Intertrochanteric Fractures

  • Fractures located between the greater and lesser trochanter
    • Extracapsular
    • Intertrochanteric region is the transition from femoral neck to femoral shaft
    • Highly vascularized with good healing potential

Subtrochanteric Fractures

  • Proximal femur fractures occurring below the intertrochanteric region and within 5 cm of the lesser trochanter
  • Higher rates of implant failure, nonunion and malunion because of the flared cortical bone
  • Deforming forces from muscle attachments on the Greater Trochanter and Lesser Trochanter on proximal fragment
  • Common in patients undergoing bisophosphonate therapy for osteoporosis[5]

Pathoanatomy

Associated Injuries


Risk Factors


Differential Diagnosis


Clinical Features

  • History
    • Patients will endorse a traumatic mechanism
    • Complain of pain in the hip and thigh region
    • Pain is worse with movement
  • Physical Exam: Physical Exam Hip
    • If displaced, the limb may be shortened, externally rotated, flexed and abducted
  • Special Tests

Evaluation

Radiographs

  • Standard Pelvic Radiographs include AP Pelvis, Cross-table lateral
    • Recommended to avoid frog-leg view as it can displace fractures
    • Traction-internal rotation AP view can be helpful to evaluate FN or IT fractures
  • Additionally, Standard Femur Radiographs should be obtained as well as Standard Knee Radiographs
  • Subtrochanteric Fracture
    • Proximal fragment is flxed, abducted
    • Distal fragment adducted, externally rotated

CT

  • CT can be beneficial
  • Better characterizes fracture pattern
  • Not required as part of a standard workup

MRI

  • Useful for occult or pathologic fractures

Classification

Femoral Neck Fractures

Garden Classification

  • Based on AP radiographs
  • Type I: Incomplete fracture or valgus impacted
  • Type II: Complete fracture, nondisplaced
  • Type III: Complete fracture, partially displaced
  • Type IV: Complete fracture, fully displaced

Powell Classification

  • Type I: < 30° from horizontal
  • Type II: 30° to 50° from horizontal
  • Type III: > 50° from horizontal
    • Most unstable, highest risk of nonunion or AVN

Intertrochanteric Fractures

  • Several classification systems exist, none widely used
  • Stability appears to be most reliable method
    • Stable: intact posteromedial cortex
    • Unstable: comminuted posteromedial cortex, thin lateral wall, reverse obliquity, subtroch extension
      • Lateral wall thickness: assessed by drawing a 135° line from a point 3 cm distal to the innominate tubercle; measurements under 20.5 mm indicate elevated risk of lateral wall compromise after fixation

Subtrochanteric Fractures

Russel-Taylor Classification

  • Type I: No extension into piriformis fossa
  • Type II: Extension into greater trochanter with involvement of piriformis fossa

Management

Prognosis

  • Associated with a high morbidity and mortality
    • 1-year mortality rate in elderly patients is 20% to 30%[6]
  • Early operative intervention has been shown to decrease complications such as pneumonia, pressure sores[7]
    • Early surgery also decreases mortality at one year (need citation)
  • Nonoperative management can be associated with prolonged immobility and associated with[8]
    • Pneumonia
    • Urinary tract infections
    • Decubitus wounds
    • Deep venous thromboses
  • Factors that increase mortality (need citation)
    • Male gender (25-30% mortality) vs female (20% mortality)
    • Higher in intertrochanteric fracture (vs FN, IT)
    • Operative delay of more than 48 hours
    • Age >85 years
    • 2 or more pre-existing medical conditions
    • ASA classification (ASA III and IV increases mortality)

Nonoperative

  • Indications
    • Rarely indicated
    • Consider in non-ambulatory patients with minimal pain
    • Consider in sick patients with high surgical risk

Nonoperative

  • Technique (FN)
    • Closed reduction percutaneous fixation (CRPF)
    • Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)
    • Total hip arthroplasty (THA)
    • Hemiarthroplasty (HA)
  • Technique (IT)
    • Cephalomedullary nail (CMN)
    • Sliding hip comprsesion screw
    • Arthroplasty
  • Technique (ST)
    • Intramedullary rod
    • Fixed Angle Plate

Rehab and Return to Play

Rehabilitation

  • Needs to be updated

Return to Play

  • Individualized but athlete should be
    • Off pain medication
    • Relatively pain free
    • Full range of motion

Complications

  • Femoral Neck Fractures
    • Osteonecrosis
    • Nonunion
    • Dislocation
    • Failure Rates
  • Intertrochanteric fractures
    • Implant failure
    • Anterior perforation
    • Nonunion
    • Malunion
  • Subtrochanteric fractures
    • Nonunion
    • Varus/ procurvatum malunion
    • Bisphosophate fractures increased risk of surgical fracture or hardware failure

See Also


References

  1. Dennison E, Mohamed MA, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2006; 32:617–629.
  2. Roberts KC, Brox WT, Jevsevar DS, et al. Management of hip fractures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23:131–137.
  3. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17:1726–1733.
  4. Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Rokito AS, et al. Patients with femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures. Are they the same? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 330:166–172.
  5. Puhaindran ME, Farooki A, Steensma MR, et al. Atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures in patients with skeletal malignant involvement treated with intravenous bisphosphonates. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:1235–1242.
  6. Giversen IM. Time trends of mortality after first hip fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2007; 18:721–732.
  7. Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2010; 182:1609–1616.
  8. Ahn J, Bernstein J. Fractures in brief: intertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:1450–1452.
Created by:
John Kiel on 5 July 2019 08:28:38
Authors:
Last edited:
17 June 2025 16:46:06
Categories:
Lower Extremity | Trauma | Hip | Fractures | Acute