Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture
Other Names
- Biceps Tendon Tear
- Biceps Tendon Partial Tear
- Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture
- Distal biceps tendon tear
- Complete distal biceps rupture
- Partial distal biceps tendon tear
- Biceps tendon rupture at the elbow
- Distal biceps avulsion
- Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon
- Avulsion of the distal biceps brachii tendon
Background
- This page refers to partial and complete tears of the distal biceps tendon of the Biceps Brachii
History
- First published case attributed to Starks in 1843[1]
Epidemiology
- Rare occurrence
- Most common in active, middle age males
- Dominant extremity most commonly involved (86% in one study)[2]
Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture
- Most common form of distal biceps tendon injury (need citation)
- 1.2 - 2.55 ruptures per 100,000 person years[2][3]
Introduction



General
- Typically occur in middle aged males from eccentric loading of a flexed elbow, typically dominant arm[5]
- The rupture usually occurs at the tendon insertion into the radial tuberosity
- Clinical presentation includes a painful tearing sensation in the antecubital region
- Surgical repair is the mainstay of treatment for active patients with better outcomes with early repair[6]
Pathogenesis
- Typically involves some form of trauma
- Most commonly, a heavy, uncontrolled eccentric load from a flexed position
- Seiler et al: hypovascular zone of ~ 2 cm seen in cadavar study[7]
- Thus poor blood supply in a watershed area suspected as a predisposing risk factor
Anatomy of the Biceps Brachii
- Distal biceps tendon is composed of two heads
- Short Head: Medial, inserts distally, includes the apex of the bicipital tuberosity[8]
- Long Head: Lateral, deep to short head, inserts more proximally on the bicipital tuberosity
- Associated anatomy
- Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve: sensory branch of Musculocutaneous Nerve
- Posterior Interosseus Nerve
- Bicepital Aponeurosis (lacertus fibrosus)
Associated Conditions
Risk Factors
- Manual labour
- Weight training
- Anabolic steroids
- Tobacco Use
- 7.5 fold greater risk[2]
- Elevated body mass index (BMI)
- Pre-existing tendon degeneration
- Decreased vascularity at the insertion site[5]
Differential Diagnosis
Differential Diagnosis Elbow Pain
- Fractures
- Adult
- Pediatric
- Dislocations & Instability
- Tendinopathies
- Bursopathies
- Ligament Injuries
- Neuropathies
- Arthropathies
- Other
- Pediatric Considerations
- Little League Elbow
- Panners Disease (Avascular Necrosis of the Capitellum)
- Nursemaids Elbow (Radial Head Subluxation)
Clinical Features


History
- Patients typically report a specific injury (i.e. lifting a heavy object), although sometimes injury can be more insidious
- May have heard or felt a 'popping' sensation
- Usually an eccentric loading of a flexed elbow
- Patients are middle aged men, age 40-60
- Mechanism is sometimes described as an unexpected extension force applied to a flexed arm
- Reports pain, weakness with elbow flexion and supination
Physical: Physical Exam Elbow
- Inspection: evaluate for ecchymosis, swelling
- Deformity of muscle belly with proximal retraction of muscle belly
- The bicepital aponeurosis can feel like an intact tendon despite a tear
- This suggests a partial tear rather than ac omplete tear
- Pain, weakness in flexion and supination
- Weakness on supination is 100% sensitive for complete, chronic ruptures[10]
Special Tests (for tendon rupture)
- Hook Test: Examiner should be able to 'hook' finger under tendon if intact
- Sensitivity and specificity approach 100%[10]
- Biceps Squeeze Test: Squeezing biceps muscle to see if supination occurs
- Passive Forearm Pronation Test:
- Biceps Crease Interval (BCI):
- Biceps Palpation Rotation Test
- Sensitivity for partial tears is around 100%[11]
Evaluation



Radiographs
- Standard Radiographs Elbow
- Screening tool to exclude other etiologies
- Typically normal, may show soft tissue swelling
- Potential findings
- Hypertrophic bone at radial tuberosity
US
- Can be considered as an alternative to MRI
- Provides good early evaluation
- There is a strong correlation between ultrasound findings and need for surgical intervention[14]
- Diagnostic accuracy
- Lobo et al: 95% sensitivity, 71% specificity, and 91% accuracy for the diagnosis of complete versus partial DBT tears[15]
- DBT had 97% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 98% accuracy for complete tear versus normal tendon
MRI
- Gold standard for evaluating distal biceps tendon ruptures
- Better at detecting partial tears and tendinopathies than ultrasound[16]
- Findings[17]
- Absence of the tendon distally
- Fluid-filled tendon sheath
- Antecubital fossa mass
- Muscle edema and atrophy are non-specific
- May not be indicated in patients with obvious complete rupture requiring surgical management
- Consider FABS position (lexed, abducted, supinated position)[18]
- 100% sensitive for complete tears, 59% sensitive for partial tears[19]
Classification
- Partial (insertional or intrasubstance) vs Complete tears
- Acute (< 4 weeks) vs chronic (> 4 weeks)
- Intact or ruptured lacertus fibrosus
Management



Nonoperative: Partial Tears
- Indications
- Non-operative approach is considered first line in most patients
- Initial approach
- Brief period of splinting, preferably with Long Arm Posterior Splint
- Activity modifications
- NSAIDS
- Physical Therapy
- Ultrasound guided injection therapy
- Demonstrates similar overall success rates to wait and see, physical therapy approaches
- Provides the fastest symptom relief within 1 week[21]
- Progression to complete tears
- Most studies suggest partial tears treatd nonoperatively will not progress to complete tears
- There are a few case reports of partial tears progressing to complete tears[22]
Nonoperative: Complete Tears
- Indications
- Older, low demand individuals
- Most experts agree than acute tears are a surgical injury with patients generally having good results
- Outcomes are better in surgically treated patients[23][24]
- Nonoperative management can be considered in low-demand, sedentary patients after discussion of risks/benefits
- Lose: 50% supination strength, 30% flexion strength, 15% grip strength (need citation)
- Treatment
- Posterior Short Arm Splint or Posterior Short Arm Cast with early mobilization
- NSAIDS
- Physical Therapy
Operative: Partial Tears
- Indication
- Failure of non-operative management
- Technique
- Tenotomy and then tendon repair with debridement of surrounding tissue
Operative: Acute Tears
- Indications
- Operative management is indicated in most cases
- Technique
- Single- or double- incision
Operative: Chronic Tears
- Challenging to manage surgically due to tendon retraction and muscle atrophy, scarring of fibrous tissue
Rehab and Return to Play

Rehabilitation
- Operative[25]
- Immobilized in flexion for a period ranging from 1-6 weeks, typically ~2 weeks
- Early range of motion
- Strengthening begins at the 6-8 week mark
- Early range of motion
- Early versus delayed mobilization protocols demonstrate no clinically significant differences in patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, or complication rates[26]
Rehab Protocol PDFs
- Ohio State Distal Biceps Repair Guidelines PDF
- Mass General Rehabilitation Protocol for Distal Biceps Tendon Repair PDF
- Rehabilitation Protocol Nonoperative Biceps tendinopathy tear PDF
Return to Play
- General[27]
- Return to sport rates range from 91-97%
- Ocurr at a mean of 6.0-6.3 months postoperatively
- 85% of patients returning to preinjury levels or higher
- Return to work averages 14.4 weeks (range 3-4 months)
- Factors assocaited with higher return to play
- Bone tunnel fixation
- ≤2 weeks of postoperative immobilization
- Early initiation of active ROM
- Strengthening at ≤10 weeks
Prognosis and Complications
Prognosis
- General
- Outcomes are generally excellent with surgical repair
- 90% of patients achieving good-to-excellent results and return to sport rates of 91-97%
- Operative treatment results in superior strength recovery compared to nonoperative management
- Surgical outcomes
- Patients undergoing surgical repair can expect near-complete restoration of strength and function
- Operative treatment results in superior supination strength, flexion strength, and patient-reported outcomes compared to nonoperative care[28]
- Anatomic reinsertion produces excellent or good results in 90% of patients at an average follow-up of 3 years[29]
- Nonsurgical outcomes
- Can yield acceptable outcomes with modestly reduced strength, supination (63% of contralateral arm strength) compared to flexion (93% of contralateral arm)[30]
- Patient-reported outcomes remain satisfactory, with median Mayo Elbow Performance Index scores of 95 and DASH scores of 9
Complications
- Permanent functional deficits
- Losses of up to 40% in supination strength and 30% in flexion strength[31]
- Residual weakness
- Loss of strength
- Disability
- Surgical
- PIN Injuries
- Heterotopic Ossification
- Synostosis
- Radial Head Fracture
- lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve palsy
- Superficial radial nerve palsy
- Re-rupture[32]
- Correlate with postoperative immobilization protocols
- More conservative immobilization appears protective, with re-rupture occurring in 14% of cast users versus 100% of those using no immobilization
See Also
Internal
References
- ↑ McReynolds IS. Avulsion of the insertion of the biceps brachii tendon and its surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:1780-81.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Safran, Marc R., and Scott M. Graham. "Distal biceps tendon ruptures: incidence, demographics, and the effect of smoking." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (1976-2007) 404 (2002): 275-283.
- ↑ Kelly, Mick P., et al. "Distal biceps tendon ruptures: an epidemiological analysis using a large population database." The American journal of sports medicine 43.8 (2015): 2012-2017.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Carrazana-Suarez, Luis F., Sean Cooke, and Christopher C. Schmidt. "Return to play after distal biceps tendon repair." Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine 15.2 (2022): 65-74.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Ramsey, Matthew L. "Distal biceps tendon injuries: diagnosis and management." JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 7.3 (1999): 199-207.
- ↑ Srinivasan, Ramesh C., William C. Pederson, and Bernard F. Morrey. "Distal biceps tendon repair and reconstruction." The Journal of hand surgery 45.1 (2020): 48-56.
- ↑ Seiler JG 3rd, Parker LM, Chamberland PD, Sherbourne GM, Carpenter WA . The distal biceps tendon. Two potential mechanisms involved in its rupture: arterial supply and mechanical impingement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:149-56
- ↑ Athwal GS, Steinmann SP, Rispoli DM. The distal biceps tendon: footprint and relevant clinical anatomy. J Hand Surg Am 2007;32:1225-1229.
- ↑ www.merckmanuals.com
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Zwerus, Elisa L., et al. "Distal biceps tendon ruptures: diagnostic strategy through physical examination." The American Journal of Sports Medicine 50.14 (2022): 3956-3962.
- ↑ Caputo, Vincent, et al. "The utility of the biceps palpation-rotation test in diagnosing partial distal biceps tendon tears." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 31.8 (2022): 1603-1609.
- ↑ Khan, Zeeshan A., et al. "Single-incision distal biceps tendon repair with bicortical tensionable locking button fixation." Arthroscopy Techniques 12.11 (2023): e2063-e2069.
- ↑ Case courtesy of Maulik S Patel, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 48835
- ↑ Blasi, Marc, et al. "Ultrasound classification of traumatic distal biceps brachii tendon injuries." (2018): 519-532.
- ↑ Lobo LdaG, Fessell DP, Miller BS, et al. The role of sonography in differentiating full versus partial distal biceps tendon tears: correlation with surgical findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:158-162.
- ↑ Chen, Karen C., et al. "ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Elbow and Forearm Pain." Journal of the American College of Radiology 21.11 (2024): S355-S363.
- ↑ Falchook FS, Zlatkin MB, Erbacher GE et-al. Rupture of the distal biceps tendon: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1994;190 (3): 659-63.
- ↑ Giuffrè BM, Moss MJ. Optimal positioning for MRI of the distal biceps brachii tendon: flexed abducted supinated view. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:944-946.
- ↑ Festa A, Mulieri PJ, Newman JS, et al. Effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting partial and complete distal biceps tendon rupture. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(1):77– 83.
- ↑ Gluck, Matthew J., et al. "Comparative strength of elbow splint designs: a new splint design as a stronger alternative to posterior splints." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 28.4 (2019): e125-e130.
- ↑ Jansen, Neal, et al. "Efficacy of conservative Treatment Strategies for Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures. A case-control study." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (2025).
- ↑ Kelly EW, Steinmann S, O’Driscoll SW. Surgical treatment of partial distal biceps tendon ruptures through a single posterior incision. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(5):456 – 461.
- ↑ Chillemi C, Marinelli M, De Cupis V . Rupture of the distal biceps brachii tendon: conservative treatment versus anatomic reinsertion—clinical and radiological evaluation after 2 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:705-8
- ↑ Hetsroni I, Pilz-Burstein R, Nyska M, Back Z, Barchilon V, Mann G . Avulsion of the distal biceps brachii tendon in middle-aged population: is surgical repair advisable? A comparative study of 22 patients treated with either nonoperative management or early anatomical repair. Injury. 2008;39:753-60
- ↑ Boufadel, Peter, et al. "Return to Sport After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review." The American Journal of Sports Medicine 53.7 (2025): 1769-1778.
- ↑ Simpson, Evan R., et al. "No Clinically Significant Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Range of Motion Between Early and Delayed Mobilization After Primary Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis." The American Journal of Sports Medicine (2025): 03635465251317207.
- ↑ Gowd, Anirudh K., et al. "Return to sport and weightlifting analysis following distal biceps tendon repair." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 30.9 (2021): 2097-2104.
- ↑ Looney, Austin M., et al. "Operative vs. nonoperative treatment of distal biceps ruptures: a systematic review and meta-analysis." Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 31.4 (2022): e169-e189.
- ↑ Rantanen, Jussi, and Sakari Orava. "Rupture of the distal biceps tendon." The American Journal of Sports Medicine 27.2 (1999): 128-132.
- ↑ Freeman, Carl R., et al. "Nonoperative treatment of distal biceps tendon ruptures compared with a historical control group." JBJS 91.10 (2009): 2329-2334.
- ↑ Stoll, Laura E., and Jerry I. Huang. "Surgical treatment of distal biceps ruptures." Orthopedic Clinics 47.1 (2016): 189-205.
- ↑ Rosenthal, Ron, Ryan S. Ting, and Doron Sher. "Management of distal biceps tendon ruptures: a survey of fellowship-trained subspecialist elbow surgeons." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 32.10 (2023): e495-e503.
Created by:
John Kiel on 18 June 2019 01:55:03
Authors:
Last edited:
2 April 2026 10:59:08
Categories: