Jump to content
We need you! See something you could improve? Make an edit and help improve WikSM for everyone.

Fifth Metatarsal Fracture

From WikiSM
(Redirected from Jones Fracture)

Other Names

  • Jones Fracture
  • Pseudo Jones Fracture
  • Fifth metatarsal base fracture
  • 5th Metatarsal fracture
  • Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures
  • Dancers Fracture

Background

History

  • Sir Robert Jones was the first to describe a fracture of the proximal 5th metatarsal in 1902[1]

Epidemiology

  • Prevalence
    • All metatarsal fractures make up 5-6% of fractures encountered in the primary care setting[2]
    • 5th metatarsal fractures account for 68% of all metatarsal fractures[2]
  • Incidence
    • Peak incidence second to fifth decades of life

Pathophysiology

Illustration of fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal and os peroneum[3]
Lawrence and Botte Classification of fracture zones

Location

  • Proximal metatarsal fractures divided into 3 zones[4]
    • The term 'Jones fracture' is no longer used to avoid confusion
    • Zone 1: 93% fractures
    • Zone 2: 4% fractures
    • Zone 3: 3% fractures
  • Zone 1
    • Alternatively referred to as a Pseudo-Jones fracture
    • Defined as a styloid or tuberosity avulsion fracture
  • Zone 2
    • Historically, referred to as a Jones fracture
    • Defined by fracture at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fracture
  • Zone 3 fracture
    • Defined as a proximal diaphyseal fracture, distal to the 4th/5th articulation
    • Generally considered to be a metatarsal stress fracture
  • Dancers Fracture
    • Fracture of the distal metatarsal shaft or neck

Mechanism

  • Zone 1
    • Due to forefoot supination with plantar flexion[5] or plantarflexion and hindfoot inversion
    • Results in pull from the lateral band of the plantar fascia and peroneus brevis[6]
    • Fracture pattern is transverse to slightly oblique
    • Occasional: comminuted, significantly displaced or disrupt the cuboid-base of fifth metatarsal joint
  • Zone 2
    • Thought to result from a large adduction force applied to the forefoot with the ankle plantar flexed

Associated Conditions

Pathoanatomy

  • 5th Metatarsal
    • Divided into tuberosity, base, metadiaphysis, diaphysis, neck, and head
    • Watershed blood supply about 1.5 cm distal to tuberosity makes it particularly susceptible to non-union

Risk Factors

  • Unknown

Differential Diagnosis


Clinical Features

  • History
    • Acute mechanism
    • Pain with weight bearing
    • Swelling/bruising
  • Physical Exam: Physical Exam Foot And Ankle
    • Skin tenting, deformity are rare
    • Point tenderness over lateral forefoot
  • Special Tests

Evaluation

Ankle XR: Nondisplaced avulsion fracture of the base of the 5th metatarsal (zone 1)

Radiographs

  • Standard Radiographs Foot
    • Strongly consider imaging ankle as well
  • Up to 23% of fractures may not be visible on standard 3 view[7]
    • Consider additionl fifth metatarsal base projection: AP radiograph of the ankle which includes the 5th metatarsal
  • Stress fracture
    • Poor sensitivity for stress fracture, if concern remains can repeat imaging in 10-14 days
    • Look for reabsoption gap around fracture site

CT

  • May consider CT for complex cases

MRI

  • MRI for high suspicion of stress fracture

Classification System

Classification system created by Mehlhorn et al[18] based on risk of displacement with more medial joint entry of the fracture line. Type I, type II, type III are defined as fracture line entry in the lateral one-third, middle one-third and medial one-third, respectively[8]

Torg Anatomic Classification

  • Zone 1 (Pseudo-Jones fracture)
    • Proximal tubercle avulsion
  • Zone 2 (Jones fracture)
    • Metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction, involving 4th/5th metatarsal articulation
  • Zone 3
    • Proximal diaphyseal fracture, distal to 4th/5th articulation

Torg Radiographic Classification

  • Type I
    • Narrow fracture line without intramedullary sclerosis
    • Acute
  • Type II
    • Widened fracture line with intramedullary sclerosis
    • Delayed Union
  • Type III
    • Widened intramedullary canal with no callus
    • Nonunion

Melhorn Classification

  • Description (see thumbnail)
    • Divides joint surface of 5th metatarsal base into three equal parts (Type I, II, III)
    • Adds risk of displacement (A or B)

Management

Post Op Shoe

Nonoperative treatment

Operative treatment

  • Indications
    • Irreducible zone 1 fracture or zone 1 fracture involving the joint
    • Displaced zone 2
    • Nondisplaced zone 2 fracture in competitive athlete
    • > than 4 mm displacement, > 10° plantar angulation
    • Avulsion fractures > 3 mm displacement or comminution
    • Involves more than 30% of the cubometatarsal joint
    • Mehlhorn type IIIA
    • Delayed or nonunion zone 2 iinjuries
  • Technique
    • Open reduction, internal fixation

Rehab and Return to Play

Rehabilitation

  • Needs to be updated

Return to Play

  • Nondisplaced zone 1
    • Treated with progressive weight-bearing and protective shoe or cast
    • Return to play dictated by pain level
  • After surgical intervention
    • 1-2 weeks of immobilization and non-weight bearing
    • Followed progressive weight-bearing in short leg cast or walking boot for 4-6 weeks
    • Functional braces/orthotics can be used in cases of athletes for expedited return to play as tolerated

Complications and Prognosis

Prognosis

  • Nondisplaced zone 2 (Jones) Fractures with early surgical fixation
    • Many studies advocate for early surgical management in active population
    • Porter et al: quicker return to sport, clinical healing in competitive athletes[13]
    • Mindrebo et al: return to sport by 8.5 weeks, radiographic union at about 6 weeks[14]
    • Quill et al: 1 in 3 nonoperative fractures re-fractured, required surgery, recommends early surgery[15]
    • Mologne et al: compared nonoperative (non weight bearing cast) to operative (early IM screw)[16]
      • Operative group had reduced time to return to sport, faster clinical union by almost 50%
      • Incidence of treatment failure in conservative group was 44%
  • Nondisplaced 5th metatarsal shaft, neck fractures
    • O'Malley et al: 31/35 dancers treated conservatively returned to dance without limitations or pain[17]
  • Predictors of adverse outcomes[18]

Complications

  • Delayed union
    • One study of all metatarsal fractures estimated it as high as 27%[20]
  • Nonunion
    • Nondisplaced zone 1 fractures have low nonunion rates (0.5%-1%)[20]
  • Failure of fixation
  • Refracture
  • Painful hardware
  • Sural Nerve Injury
  • Persistent or chronic pain
    • 25% of patients with styloid avulsion fractures experience pain one year post-injury (need citation)

See Also


References


  1. Jones R. I. Fracture of the Base of the Fifth Metatarsal Bone by Indirect Violence. Ann Surg. 1902;35:697–700.2.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Petrisor BA, Ekrol I, Court-Brown C. The epidemiology of metatarsal fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:172–174.
  3. Case courtesy of Frank Gaillard, Radiopaedia.org, rID: 7644
  4. Thomas JL, Davis BC. Three-wire fixation technique for displaced fifth metatarsal base fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;50:776–779.
  5. Fetzer GB, Wright RW. Metatarsal shaft fractures and fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:139–150, x.
  6. Chuckpaiwong B, Queen RM, Easley ME, Nunley JA. Distinguishing Jones and proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1966–1970.
  7. Pao D, Keats T and Dussault R. Avulsion fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal not seen on conventional radiography of the foot: the need for an additional projection. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175: 549–552.
  8. Mehlhorn AT, Zwingmann J, Hirschmüller A, Südkamp NP, Schmal H. Radiographic classification for fractures of the fifth metatarsal base. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43:467–474.
  9. Shahid MK, Punwar S, Boulind C, Bannister G. Aircast walking boot and below-knee walking cast for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a comparative cohort study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:75–79.
  10. Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995:238–241.
  11. Gray AC, Rooney BP, Ingram R. A prospective comparison of two treatment options for tuberosity fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot (Edinb) 2008;18:156–158.
  12. Wiener BD, Linder JF, Giattini JF. Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18:267–269.
  13. Porter DA, Duncan M, Meyer SJ. Fifth metatarsal Jones fracture fixation with a 4.5-mm cannulated stainless steel screw in the competitive and recreational athlete: a clinical and radiographic evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:726–733.
  14. Mindrebo N, Shelbourne KD, Van Meter CD, Rettig AC. Outpatient percutaneous screw fixation of the acute Jones fracture. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:720–723.
  15. Quill GE. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995;26:353–361.M
  16. Mologne TS, Lundeen JM, Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ. Early screw fixation versus casting in the treatment of acute Jones fractures. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:970–975.
  17. O’Malley MJ, Hamilton WG, Munyak J. Fractures of the distal shaft of the fifth metatarsal. “Dancer’s fracture” Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:240–243.
  18. Cakir H, Van Vliet-Koppert ST, Van Lieshout EM, De Vries MR, Van Der Elst M, Schepers T. Demographics and outcome of metatarsal fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:241–245.
  19. Tahririan MA, Momeni A, Moayednia A, Yousefi E. Designing a prognostic scoring system for predicting the outcomes of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures at 20 weeks. Iran J Med Sci. 2015;40:104–109.
  20. 20.0 20.1 Konkel KF, Menger AG, Retzlaff SA. Nonoperative treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures in an orthopaedic suburban private multispeciality practice. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:704–707.
Created by:
Parker.young on 17 December 2020 17:44:24
Authors:
Last edited:
15 November 2024 16:19:53
Categories: