Jump to content
We need you! See something you could improve? Make an edit and help improve WikSM for everyone.

Traumatic Navicular Fracture

From WikiSM
(Redirected from Acute Navicular Fracture)


Other Names

  • Acute navicular fracture
  • Tarsal Navicular Fractures
  • Traumatic Navicular Fracture

Background

History

Epidemiology

  • Most frequently injured tarsal bone (need citation)

Pathophysiology

Mechanism

  • Most commonly associated with MVC
  • Avulsion fracture
    • About 50% of them are avulsion fractures[1]
    • Can be due to disruption of a variety of soft tissue structures
  • Body fractures
    • Direct (crush)
    • Indirect (axial load)
      • Main et al: longitudinal compression of the plantarflexed foot causes impaction of the cuneiforms into the navicular[2]
      • Nyska et al: cuneiforms are compressed backward, causing the navicular to be crushed bytalar head with ankle in plantarflexion[3]
      • Others: it is a combination of plantarflexion and abduction at the midtarsus
  • Tuberosity fractures
    • Due to eversion with simultaneous contraction of Posterior Tibialis Tendon
    • May represent an acute widening/diastasis of an accessory navicular

Associated Conditions

  • Ipsilateral foot injuries
    • One study identified a 62% incidence of concurrent midfoot and hindfoot injuries[4]

Pathoanatomy


Risk Factors

  • Unknown

Differential Diagnosis


Clinical Features

  • History
    • Acute injuries should have a traumatic etiology
    • Avulsion and tuberosity fractures usually have a low-energy mechanism
    • Body fractures usually have a high energy mechanism
    • Patient will endorse pain, swelling over the midfoot
    • Trouble weight bearing
  • Physical Exam: Physical Exam Foot
    • Swelling may be noted over dorsomedial midfoot
    • Tenderness to navicular
    • Limited weight bearing, pain with push-off during gait
  • Special Tests

Evaluation

Displaced navicular fracture pre and post operatively[6]

Radiographs

  • Standard Radiographs Foot
    • Initial imaging modality of choice
    • Not very sensitive for navicular fracture
    • Lateral, oblique views provide best detail (need citation)
  • Acute findings
    • Avulsion fracture demonstrate a fleck of cortical bone
  • Accessory navicular bone
    • May be seen and can present as a fracture
    • May also be confused as a tuberosity fracture
    • Compare to other foot as needed

CT

  • Utility
    • More sensitive than radiographs for identifying navicular fractures
    • Useful to assess extent of fracture, degree of comminution

MRI

  • Utility
    • Most sensitive for identifying stress fractures[7]
    • Not generally indicated for acute fractures
  • Findings
    • T2 hyperintensity over fracture site indicating bone edema

Classification

Sangeorzan Classification

  • Used to assess severity of fracture, determine management[8]
  • Type I
    • Fracture line is in the coronal plane
    • Dorsal fragment consisting of less than 50% of the body
    • No angulation of the forefoot
    • No disruption of the alignment of the foot’s medial border
  • Type II
    • Fracture line is dorsal-lateral to plantar-medial
    • Major fragment and forefoot is medially displaced
    • Naviculocuneiform joint usually remains intact
    • Dorsal talonavicular ligament is often involved
  • Type III
    • Comminuted fracture in the sagittal plane
    • Medial border of the foot is usually disrupted at the naviculocuneiform joint
    • Forefoot is displaced laterally
    • Some involvement of the calcaneocuboid joint as well[9]

Management

Nonoperative

  • Indications
    • Avulsion fractures
    • Nondisplaced body fractures
  • Avulsion fracture
    • Immobilization: Supportive Shoe, Cast Boot, Short Leg Cast
    • If limited swelling and soft tissue injury, can weight bear as tolerated
    • If more serious swelling, pain or ligament injury, non weight bearing for 6 weeks
  • Body fracture
    • Protected weight bearing in a Short Leg Cast
    • Radiographs every 2-4 weeks to assess for displacement

Operative

  • Indications<ref>Banerjee R, Nickisch F, Easley M, DiGiovanni CW. Foot injuries. In Browner B, Jupiter J, Levine A, Trafton P, Krettek C, eds. Skeletal Trauma. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2008:2671-2672./ref>
    • Displacement or joint incongruity greater than 1 mm
    • Medial column shortening greater than 2 to 3 mm
    • Resultant subluxation or dislocation
    • Lateral column involvement
    • Open wounds
    • Compartment syndrome
    • Gross instability
    • Skin tenting
    • Irreducible dislocations
  • Technique
    • Open reduction, internal fixation (ORIF)

Rehab and Return to Play

Rehabilitation

  • Needs to be updated

Return to Play/ Work

  • Needs to be updated

Complications and Prognosis

Prognosis

  • Surgical outcomes
    • Fracture pattern, quality of reduction correlate with outcome[4]
    • Sangeorzan et al: satisfactory reduction obtained in type-1 fractures (100%), type- 2 (67%), type-3 (50%)[8]
    • Evans found no evidence of nonunion, loss of reduction, deep infection with miniplate fixation[4]
  • Radiograph changes
    • Evidence of healing in acute fractures seen at an average of 8.5 weeks[9]

Complications


See Also


References

  1. Pinney S, Sangeorzan BJ. Fractures of the tarsal bones. In: Sangeorzan BJ, ed. The Traumatized Foot. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 2001:41-53.
  2. Main BJ, Jowett RL. Injuries of the midtarsal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975; 57:89-97.
  3. Nyska M, Marguiles J, Barbarawi M, Mutchler W, Dekel S, Segal D. Fractures of the body of the tarsal navicular bone. J Trauma. 1989; 29:1448-1451.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Evans J, Beingnessner D, Agel J, Benirschke SK. Minifragment plate fixation of highenergy navicular body fractures. Foot Ankle Int. 2011; 32:485.
  5. Eichenholtz SN, Levine DB. Fractures of the tarsal navicular bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1964; 34:142-157.
  6. Image courtesy of orthobullets.com
  7. Rosenbaum AJ, Uhl RL, DiPreta JA. Acute fractures of the tarsal navicular. (2014) Orthopedics. 37 (8): 541-6.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Sangeorzan BJ, Benirschke SK, Mosca V, Mayo KA, Hansen ST. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the tarsal navicular. (1989) The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 71 (10): 1504-10.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Golano P, Farinas O, Saenz I. The anatomy of the navicular and periarticular structures. Foot Ankle Clin. 2004; 9:1-23.
Created by:
John Kiel on 28 September 2021 17:07:42
Authors:
Last edited:
8 April 2025 16:25:40
Categories: