Jump to content
We need you! See something you could improve? Make an edit and help improve WikSM for everyone.

Patellar Instability

From WikiSM

Other Names

  • Unstable Patella
  • Lateral Patellar Instability
  • Patellofemoral Instability
  • Recurrent Patellar Dislocation
  • Patellar Dislocation
  • Patellar Subluxation
  • Chronic Patellar Instability
  • Recurrent Patellar Subluxation

Background

History

  • 1950s–1970s: Trillat & Lyon School established patellar instability as a biomechanical malalignment problem and introduced early realignment procedures such as tibial tubercle transfer[1]
  • Mid–Late 20th Century the use of lateral release, medial reefing, and other nonanatomic procedures with inconsistent outcomes highlighted the need for better understanding of patellofemoral mechanics [2]
  • In 1980 Dejour identified key anatomic risk factors (trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, increased TT–TG distance)[3]
  • Biomechanical studies established the medial patellofemoral ligament as the primary restraint to lateral patellar translation[4]

Epidemiology

  • Incidence
    • 29/100,000 per capita risk of dislocation among adolescents (need citation)
  • Prevalence
    • 2-3% of presentations involving the knee joint include a history of patellar dislocation (need citation)
    • 50-60% of first time lateral patellar dislocations occur secondary to a sport related injury (need citation)
    • Up to 40% of skeletally immature patients may develop recurrent instability[5]
    • Up to 10% of patients may develop contralateral patellar instability[6]

Introduction

Normal patellofemoral joint, patellar instability and patellar dislocation
Lateral patellar instability in flexion. The patella dislocates laterally beyond 40º of knee flexion[7]

General

  • Characterized by abnormal lateral displacement of the patella, ranging from subluxation to recurrent dislocation of the patellofemoral joint
  • Common causes include traumatic injury, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, increased TT–TG distance, and ligamentous laxity
  • Patients typically report anterior knee pain, a sensation of the knee “giving way,” recurrent dislocations, and apprehension with knee flexion or activity
  • Diagnosis is made clinically, imaging can assess alignment and structural abnormalities
  • Treatment from nonoperative management to surgical intervention depending on severity

Etiology

  • General
  • Acute traumatic
  • Episodic/ recurrent instability/ chronic patholaxity
    • Most common type, which occurs after an initial dislocation
    • Seen in adolescent athletes, more commonly in women
  • Alternative patterns described by Chotel in pediatrics[8]
    • Congenital dislocation
    • Permanent dislocation
    • Habitual dislocation in knee flexion
    • Habitual dislocation in knee extension
  • Syndromic instability

Associated Conditions

Anatomy of the Patellofemoral Joint

Anatomy of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament
  • Patella
  • Medial Patellofemoral Ligament
    • Primary static restraint to lateral instability during first 30° of flexion
    • Prevents excessive lateral movement of the patella
    • Part of the medial patellar retinaculum
  • Medial Patellar Retinaculum
    • Important stabilizer of the patella
    • Resists lateral patellar displacement /dislocation
  • Vastus Medialis Obliquus (VMO)
    • Most distal portion of the medial quadriceps muscle
    • Exerts a medially directed force that helps keep the patella in position
  • Trochlear Groove of the Femur
    • Variants in trochlear morphology can predispose the patella to maltracking[9]
    • Gross subluxation/dislocation
    • Can influence recurrent patellar instability
  • Tibial Tubercle
    • Arises from the lateral aspect of the proximal tibia
    • Excessive lateralization increases tibial external rotation, severe genu valgum, or even increased femoral anteversion[10]
  • All effect patellar tracking

Risk Factors

Bony / Anatomic / Biomechanical Factors

  • Trochlear Dysplasia (OR: 18.1)[11]
    • Abnormal geometry of the trochlear groove that reduces the bony constraint for patellar tracking
    • Present in 68.3% of patients with recurrent dislocation[10]
  • Patella Alta
    • High riding patella delays patellar engagement in the trochlear groove
    • Caton-Deschamps >1.2 or Insall-Salvati >1.2
    • Found in 60% of recurrent dislocation patients[12]
  • Increased TT–TG distance (OR: 2.1)
    • Lateral positioning of the tibial tubercle increases lateralizing forces on the patell
    • Present in 42% of recurrent cases[13]
  • Patellar tilt (Reflects maltracking and lateral soft tissue imbalance)
  • Lateral femoral condyle hypoplasia (decreased lateral bony restraint)
  • Genu Valgum: Increased Q-angle contributing to lateral tracking
  • Miserable Malalignment Syndrome: femoral anteversion, genu valgum, external tibial torsion

Soft Tissue Factors

Patient-Specific Factors

  • Adolescent age (OR 2.61-2.72 for recurrence)[14]
    • Particularly those under 18 with open physes
    • Highest risk group for primary and recurrent instability
  • History of patellar dislocation
    • Strong predictor of recurrence
  • Female sex
  • Race
    • Reported associations in African American and Caucasian populations
  • Family history

Systemic / Connective Tissue Disorders


Differential Diagnosis


Clinical Features

Clinical example of laterally dislocated patella[7]
Patellar Apprehension Test

History

  • Important to review history of previous patellar dislocations, episodes of patellar instability
    • About 1/3 of patients will have recurrent dislocation, often within first 2 years[14]
    • Contralateral dislocations occur in 5.4% of patients
  • Patient will complain of anterior knee pain
  • Must review risk factors (anatomic, biomechanical, etc)

Physical Exam: Physical Exam Knee

  • Begin with observation of gait and standing alignment
    • May reveal genu valgum, pes planus, or an increased Q-angle
  • In acute dislocation, deformity, effusion/ hemarthrosis may be present
  • Evalaute range of motion, which should be intact
  • Tenderness
    • Commonly along medial patellar facets, inferior pole of the patella, medial parapatellar structures
    • Indicates MPFL injury

Special Tests


Evaluation

AP Knee xray demonstrating laterally dislocated patella in a 12 year old
AP Knee xray with osteochondral defect following patella dislocation

Radiographs

  • Standard Radiographs Knee
    • Ideally, standard AP and lateral weight bearing views, as well as sunrise view
    • May not be possible in setting of acute dislocation
    • Help identify fractures of the patella, avulsion fractures, loose bodies and sometimes large cartilage defects
    • PA radiographs at 45 degrees flexion may aid in assessment of the coronal alignment of the tibiofemoral joint
  • Lateral views and Sunrise or Merchant views
    • Provide information to trochlear morphology, patellar height and patellar tilt
  • Lateral patellar Tilt ((Laurin’s angle))
    • Assessed by the lateral patellofemoral angle on sunrise or merchant view
    • Angle is measured between a line along the subchondral bone of the lateral trochlear facet and posterior femoral condyles
    • Normal: angle greater than 11° that opens laterally
    • Abnormal angles: parallel or open medially
  • Patellar height
    • Can be measured by both direct and indirect methods
    • The Insall-Salvati Ratio: ratio measuring the length of the patella ligament, patellar length
      • A normal ratio is 1.0; a ratio of 1.2 suggests patella alta and 0.8 patella baja
    • Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI): distance between the distal point of the patellar articular surface and the anterior superior margin of the tibia, divided by the patellar articular surface length
      • A normal ratio is 1.0; a ratio of less than 0.6 suggests patella baja and a ratio of 1.3 suggests patella alta
    • Blackburne-Peel method (BP): ratio of the height of the lower pole of the articular surface above a tibial plateau line to the articular surface length of the patella
      • Normal between 0.54- 1.06; A ratio of less than 0.54 is considered to be patella alta
    • Technique described by Blumensaat uses the roof of the intercondylar notch as a reference line and is one of the most commonly used direct methods for the assessment of patellar height
  • True lateral radiographs and sunrise views can help identify other risk factors
    • The trochlear findings were elucidated by Dejour and Le Coultre and were subsequently revised to create the trochlear dysplasia classification system [18]
    • Crossing sign: occurs when the trochlear groove lies in the same plane as the anterior border of the lateral condyle, which represents a flattened trochlear groove
    • Double contour sign: occurs when the anterior border of the lateral condyle lies anterior to the anterior border of the medial condyle, which represents a convex trochlear groove or hypoplastic medial condyle
    • Supratrochlear spur can arise from the proximal aspect of the trochlea and can also indicate a risk factor

CT

  • Can more accurately characterize the morphology of the trochlea
  • Assess femoral and tibial torsion
  • Tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance
    • Assesses relative rotation of femur to tibia
    • The TT-GG distance is between two perpendicular lines; one from the posterior cortex to the tibial tubercle and one from the posterior cortex to the trochlear groove
    • Average 8-10 mm in pediatric and adult patients; a TT-TG distance of greater than 20 is highly associated with patellar instability

MRI

  • Common Findings[19]
    • Bruising pattern of lateral femoral condyle, medial patella
    • Disruption of the MPFL (at the medial femoral epicondyle insertion)
    • Articular cartilage injuries if present

Classification

Classification of patella instability and maltracking[20]

Parikh Classification of Patellar Instability

  • Type I: first patellofemoral dislocation with (A) or without (B) osteochondral fracture[21]
  • Type II: recurrent subluxation (A) or dislocation (B)
  • Type III: dislocatable patella by the examiner or patient which is either passive (A) or habitual in flexion/extension (B).
  • Type IV: dislocated patella that is either reducible (A) or irreducible (B).

Management

Patellar J Brace


Nonoperative

  • Indications
    • Majority of cases
    • Absence of loose bodies or osteochondral fragments, other soft tissue injuries
  • NSAIDS
  • Physical Therapy
    • Goals: restoring neuromuscular control and patellar stability[22]
    • Emphasis: Quadriceps/ VMO Strengthening gluteal, core and hip strengthening
    • Flexibility and stretching
  • Kinesiology Taping
  • Knee Immobilizer
    • May be indicated early in acute setting
  • Patellar Brace
    • Patellar stabilizing sleeve or "J" brace
    • Often used for 6-8 weeks of recovery with the goal of return to full motion
  • Activity modification

Operative

  • Indications
    • Failure of conservative management
    • Associated osteochondral fragment (≥ 5 mm)
    • Associated osseous avulsion of the MPFL
    • Associated meniscus tear
  • Techniques
    • Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction
    • MPFL reconstruction with autograft vs allograft
    • Trochleoplasty
    • Tibial tubercle osteotomy
    • Arthroscopic debridement (removal of loose body) vs Repair
    • Fulkerson-type osteotomy (anterior and medial tibial tubercle transfer)
    • Tibial tubercle distalization
    • Lateral release

Rehab and Return to Play

General patellar instability exercises
Patellar instability exercises

General Principles of Rehabilitation

  • Primary rehab goals: reduce pain/swelling, restore full ROM (0–135°), improve patellar tracking, and regain neuromuscular control[23]
  • Strength focus: VMO, quadriceps, glutes, hip girdle, and core to optimize patellofemoral stability and alignment
  • Mobility work: stretch tight lateral structures (hamstrings, quads, calf, IT band, lateral retinaculum) to reduce lateral patellar tracking
  • Neuromuscular training + adjuncts: proprioception, balance, functional progression, with bracing, taping, orthotics, and activity modification as needed
  • Progression & return-to-sport: gradual, criteria-based loading; return when ≥90% limb symmetry, functional confidence, and psychological readiness are achieved

Phase 1: Acute Phase (Weeks 1-2)

  • Goals: Pain and edema control, protect healing tissues, initiate early motion
  • Consider Motion-restricting knee brace: 0-20-40° ROM
  • Weight-bearing: Partial weight-bearing (30-60% bodyweight) with crutches
  • Range of motion: Gentle passive and active-assisted ROM within brace limits
  • Modalities: Ice, compression, elevation for edema management
  • Muscle activation: Quadriceps sets, gluteal sets, ankle pumps
  • Patellar mobilization: Gentle medial glides (if not contraindicated post-surgery)

Phase 2: Early Strengthening (Weeks 3-4)

  • Goals: Progress ROM, restore full weight-bearing, initiate quadriceps recruitment
  • Knee brace: 0-10-60° ROM
  • Weight-bearing: Progress to full weight-bearing as tolerated
  • Range of motion: Active ROM exercises, goal of 0-90° by week 4
  • Strengthening exercises:
    • Quadriceps recruitment with emphasis on vastus medialis obliquus (VMO)
    • Straight leg raises (4 planes)
    • Double leg squats with isometric hip adduction (0-45°)
    • Closed-chain terminal knee extension
    • Hip abduction and external rotation strengthening (side-lying clamshells, standing hip abduction)
  • Flexibility: Hamstring, quadriceps, gastrocnemius, iliotibial band, tensor fascia lata stretching

Phase 3: Progressive Strengthening (Weeks 5-8)

  • Goals: Restore full ROM, advance strengthening, improve neuromuscular control
  • Knee brace: 0-0-90° ROM, wean as tolerated
  • Range of motion: Full ROM (0-135°)
  • Strengthening exercises:
    • Lunges (forward, lateral, reverse)
    • Single-leg squats (0-60°)
    • Leg press with neutral foot position
    • Step-ups and step-downs (4-6 inch height)
    • Core stability exercises (planks, side planks, dead bugs)
    • Hip strengthening progression (resistance band work, single-leg bridges)
  • Neuromuscular training:
    • Balance exercises (single-leg stance, foam pad progressions)
    • Sensorimotor training for leg axis stabilization
    • Proprioceptive exercises

Phase 4: Advanced Strengthening and Sport Specific Training (Weeks 9-16)

  • Goals: Maximize strength and power, restore dynamic stability, prepare for return to sport
  • Strengthening exercises:
    • Progressive resistance training (squats, deadlifts, leg press at maximal intended velocity)
    • Plyometric exercises (box jumps, lateral hops, depth jumps)
    • Agility drills (cutting, pivoting, deceleration)
    • Sport-specific movement patterns
  • Lateral trunk muscle training
  • Continue hip and core strengthening
  • Gradual increase in training volume and intensity based on sport demands
Return to play infographic for Patellar Instability

Return to Play

  • Functional Testing Requirements:
    • Quadriceps strength: ≥90% limb symmetry index (LSI) on isokinetic testing
    • Single-limb hop testing: ≥90% LSI on all hop tests (single hop, triple hop, crossover hop, timed hop)
    • Lateral step-down test: Proper form without knee valgus or pain
    • Side hop test: ≥90% LSI
    • Lateral leap and catch test: Successful completion with proper landing mechanics
    • Y-balance test: ≥90% LSI in all directions
    • Depth jump: Proper landing mechanics with minimal ground contact time
  • Return to Sport Progression:
    • Phase 1: Non-contact sport-specific drills (weeks 12-16)
    • Phase 2: Controlled contact drills with gradual intensity increase (weeks 16-20)
    • Phase 3: Full practice participation (weeks 20-24)
    • Phase 4: Return to competition (typically 4-6 months post-injury or post-surgery)
  • Timeline Considerations:
    • Nonoperative management: 3-4 months minimum
    • Post-MPFL reconstruction: 4-6 months minimum
    • Post-tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty: 6-9 months minimum
  • Return to sport following Menetrey guidelines[24]
    • Full recovery of knee motion
    • Recovery of strength
    • Absence of a knee effusion, pain
    • Competence with sport specific exercises
  • Strongly consider

Prognosis and Complications

Severe Patellofemoral OA

Prognosis

  • Recurrence Rates
    • More than 33.6% of first time dislocations will re-dislocate following conservative management[14]
    • That risk approaches 36% over 20 years
    • Greatest risk is in the first 2 years
  • Risk factors for recurrence
    • Younger age (OR 2.61)
    • Open physes (OR 2.72)
    • Trochlear dysplasia (OR 4.15)
    • Elevated tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (OR 2.87)
    • Patella alta (OR 2.38)
  • Surgical outcomes[22]
    • Lower recurrence rates compared to conservative management
    • Surgery reduces the risk of recurrence with an odds ratio of 0.45 compared to nonoperative treatment (low quality evidence)
  • Return to sport[25]
    • Only 2/3 of patients return to their pre-injury sport level after patellar dislocation
    • Return to sport rates range from 64-82% depending on the study and treatment approach

Complications

  • Osteochondral Defect[26]
    • Occur in 70% of first time dislocations on MRI
    • Primarily affect medial patellar facet, lateral femoral condyle
  • Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis
    • 7.8 fold increased risk following patellofemoral dislocation[27]
    • Cumulative incidence: 5 years (1.2%), 10 years (2.7%), 15 years (8.15%), 20 years (14.8%), 25 years (48.9%)
    • Up to 20% of cases at 20 years following initial dislocation[6]
  • Patella Fracture
    • Can occur as a surgical complication
  • Recurrent instability
  • Failure of surgical fixation
  • Inability to return to sport
  • Quadriceps weakness
  • Pediatric specific complications
    • Physeal arrest
  • Surgical complications
    • MPFL Reconstruction complications range from 0-32.3%[28]
    • Tibial tuberocle osteotomy includes nonunion, malunion, compartment syndrome, fracture
    • Trochloeplasty include arthrofibrosis, persistent pain, cartilage damage, and progression of arthritis

See Also

Internal

External


References

  1. Arendt, Elizabeth A. “Building Bridges Across the Ocean: A Historic Review of Patellar Dislocation.” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, vol. 21, no. 2, 2013, pp. 279–293.
  2. Eliasberg, Christopher D., et al. “Failure of Patellofemoral Joint Preservation.” Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 28, no. 2, 2020.
  3. Dejour, Henri, et al. “Factors of Patellar Instability: An Anatomic Radiographic Study.” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1987.
  4. Surendran, S., et al. “Patellar Instability – Changing Beliefs and Current Trends.” Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, vol. 5, no. 3, 2014, pp. 150–156.
  5. Lewallen LW, McIntosh AL, Dahm DL. Predictors of recurrent instability after acute patellofemoral dislocation in pediatric and adolescent patients. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(3):575–81.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Sanders TL, Pareek A, Hewett TE, Stuart MJ, Dahm DL, Krych AJ. High rate of recurrent patellar dislocation in skeletally immature patients: a long-term population-based study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017
  7. 7.0 7.1 Sanchis-Alfonso, Vicente, et al. "Failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: causes and surgical strategies." World journal of orthopedics 8.2 (2017): 115.
  8. Chotel F, Berard J, Raux S. Patellar instability in children and adolescents. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1 Suppl):S125–37.
  9. Weber-Spickschen TS, Spang J, Kohn L, Imhoff AB, Schottle PB. The relationship between trochlear dysplasia and medial patellofemoral ligament rupture location after patellar dislocation: An MRI evaluation. Knee. 2011;18:185–8
  10. 10.0 10.1 Steensen RN, Bentley JC, Trinh TQ, Backes JR, Wiltfong RE. The prevalence and combined prevalences of anatomic factors associated with recurrent patellar dislocation: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:921–7.
  11. Christensen TC, Sanders TL, Pareek A, Mohan R, Dahm DL, Krych AJ. Risk factors and time to recurrent ipsilateral and contralateral patellar dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(9):2105–10.
  12. Only, Arthur J., Elizabeth A. Arendt, and Betina B. Hinckel. "Anatomic risk factors for lateral patellar instability." Arthroscopy 40.11 (2024): 2642-2644.
  13. Steensen, Robert N., et al. "The prevalence and combined prevalences of anatomic factors associated with recurrent patellar dislocation: a magnetic resonance imaging study." The American journal of sports medicine 43.4 (2015): 921-927.
  14. 14.0 14.1 14.2 Huntington, Lachlan S., et al. "Factors associated with an increased risk of recurrence after a first-time patellar dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis." The American journal of sports medicine 48.10 (2020): 2552-2562.
  15. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis. 1973 Sep;32(5):413-8
  16. Ahmad, Christopher S., et al. "The moving patellar apprehension test for lateral patellar instability." The American Journal of Sports Medicine 37.4 (2009): 791-796.
  17. Zimmermann, Felix, Michael C. Liebensteiner, and Peter Balcarek. "The reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test mimics anatomical complexity in lateral patellar instability." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 27.2 (2019): 604-610.
  18. Dejour D, Le Coultre B. Osteotomies in patello-femoral instabilities. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007 Mar;15(1):39-46
  19. Elias DA, White LM, Fithian DC. Acute lateral patellar dislocation at MR imaging: injury patterns of medial patellar soft-tissue restraints and osteochondral injuries of the inferomedial patella. Radiology. 2002 Dec;225(3):736-43.
  20. Frosch, K-H., and A. Schmeling. "A new classification system of patellar instability and patellar maltracking." Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 136.4 (2016): 485-497.
  21. Parikh SN, Lykissas MG. Classification of lateral patellar instability in children and adolescents. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47(1):145–52.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Hing, Caroline B., et al. "Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation." Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11 (2011).
  23. Watson, Richard, et al. "Lateral patellar dislocation: a critical review and update of evidence-based rehabilitation practice guidelines and expected outcomes." JBJS reviews 10.5 (2022): e21.
  24. Menetrey J, Putman S, Gard S. Return to sport after patellar dislocation or following surgery for patellofemoral instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(10):2320–6.
  25. Ménétrey, Jacques, Sophie Putman, and Suzanne Gard. "Return to sport after patellar dislocation or following surgery for patellofemoral instability." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 22.10 (2014): 2320-2326.
  26. Vollnberg, Bernd, et al. "Prevalence of cartilage lesions and early osteoarthritis in patients with patellar dislocation." European radiology 22.11 (2012): 2347-2356.
  27. Sanders, Thomas L., et al. "Patellofemoral arthritis after lateral patellar dislocation: a matched population-based analysis." The American journal of sports medicine 45.5 (2017): 1012-1017.
  28. Jackson, Garrett R., et al. "Complication rates after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction range from 0% to 32% with 0% to 11% recurrent instability: a systematic review." Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 39.5 (2023): 1345-1356.
Created by:
John Kiel on 15 March 2021 18:40:10
Last edited:
14 April 2026 19:49:37
Categories: